China Dairy ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 64-68.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.11.11

• SMART FARMING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Descriptive Evaluation of Camera-based Lameness Detection Technology Paired with Artificial Intelligence in Dairy Cattle

LIU Ye, GUO Kaijun*   

  1. Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100096
  • Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-12-10

Abstract: [Objective] The aim of this study was to explore whether autonomous camera-based(AUTO) mobility scores could detect first lameness occurrence earlier in cows,by assessing the association between average weekly AUTO mobility scores and cows with a lesion for the first time. [Method] The AUTO scores data were collected from 2 982 cows in a single farm from April to December 2022,including cow ID,mobility score(0 to 100),and observation date and time.Historical farm hoof lesion data were collected from 2 204 cows and used to determine cow lesion history and date of lesion diagnosis(LD).To remove the confounding impact of chronicity,the study focused on cows with no history of lameness and categorized them into two categories:those with a first-time LD(LESION) and those seen by a hoof trimmer without an LD(TRIM).These categories were compared based on when the trimming occurred:within seven days of dry off(DOT) or at a random time based on farm staff observation.Individual AUTO scores were summarized into moving average weekly scores.All weekly AUTO scores were reported as median[IQR].Comparisons were made for the LESION cows by lesion types. [Result] The lesion types for DOT(n = 60) were 3.3% toe ulcer(TOE),1.7% white line disease(WLD),and 1.7% sole ulcer(SU),while the remaining had no reported lesion(93%;TRIM).For RT(n = 239),63% were TRIM,17% digital dermatitis(DD),7.5% SU,7.1% WLD,4.2% foot rot(FR),and 4.2% TOE.Four weeks prior to RT,LESION had a similar median score(37.6[18.3]) to TRIM(38.5[13.7]).One week prior to RT,LESION had a higher median score(41.1[17.5]) compared to TRIM(39.2[15.5]).For DOT,four weeks prior,LESION had a higher median score(59.2[2.1]) than TRIM(40.0[9.9]),and this pattern persisted through 1 week prior.FR had the highest score(47.3[22.9]) four weeks earlier,followed by SU(42.8[19.0]),WLD(41.2[13.5]),and DD(35.0[14.1]).One week prior,these scores were increased for FR(57.1[11.5]),SU(44.5[12.4]),WLD(44.3[26.8]),and DD(39.5[10.6]). [Conclusion] The results suggest that AUTO scores may have the potential to detect some lesions earlier.However,there is variation between cows and weeks that presents a challenge yet to be addressed.

Key words: lameness detection, artificial intelligence, dairy cattle

[1] Adams A,Lombard J,Fossler C,et al.Associations between housing and management practices and the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on US dairy operations[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(3):2119-2136.
[2] Cook N,Hess J,Foy M,et al.Management characteristics,lameness, and body injuries of dairy cattle housed in high-performance dairy herds in Wisconsin[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2016,99(7):5879-5891.
[3] Keyserlingk V M,Barrientos A,Ito K,et al.Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies:Lameness,leg injuries,lying time,facility design,and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(12):7399-7408.
[4] Sabogal J C A,André D,René L,et al. Prevalence of foot lesions in Québec dairy herds from 2015 to 2018[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2020,103(12):11659-11675.
[5] Green L,Hedges V,Schukken Y,et al.The Impact of clinical Lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(9):2250-2256.
[6] Mostert P,Middelaar V C,Boer D I,et al.The impact of foot lesions in dairy cows on greenhouse gas emissions of milk production[J].Agricultural Systems,2018:167206-167212.
[7] Dhakal K,Tiezzi F,Clay J,et al.Short communication:Genomic selection for hoof lesions in first-parity US Holsteins[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(5):3502-3507.
[8] Heringstad B,Egger-Danner C,Charfeddine N,et al.Invited review:Genetics and claw health:Opportunities to enhance claw health by genetic selection[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(6):4801-4821.
[9] Alkiviadis A,Nektarios S,Joseph N,et al.Initial validation of an intelligent video surveillance system for automatic detection of dairy cattle lameness[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science,2023:101111057.
[1] GUO Hai'e, HAN Hongliang. Etiology of Common Hoof Diseases in Dairy Cattle [J]. China Dairy, 2024, 0(8): 114-118.
[2] WEI Danni, GUO Yongqing. Research Progress on the Application of Intelligent Breeding Technology in Dairy Cattle Farming [J]. China Dairy, 2024, 0(6): 31-39.
[3] ZHANG Jiuru. Analysis of the Copyright Issues of AI-generated Products in Dairy Enterprises [J]. China Dairy, 2024, 0(4): 111-114.
[4] SUN Fang. Legal Risks and Countermeasures of the Application of Artificial Intelligence Products in Dairy Enterprises under the Background of Digital Transformation [J]. China Dairy, 2024, 0(4): 106-110.
[5] LI Jiechao, SHI Ji, LIU Duncheng, FENG Xiaoyu, PANG Shuyue, MA Chong. Application of Cow Intelligent Health Management System in Early Diagnosis of Individual Cases [J]. China Dairy, 2024, 0(11): 22-28.
[6] ZHANG Juke. The Current Situation, Problems and Countermeasures of Dairy Farming in Gansu Province [J]. China Dairy, 2023, 0(5): 93-96.
[7] CAO Rongchang, DU Ziju, LIU Xiaoxing, YANG Xiaowei, ZHAO Tianzhi, HUANG Jianxin. Comparison of Main Disease Incidence between Jersey Cattle and Holstein Cattle--Take Heqing County of Yunnan Province as an example [J]. China Dairy, 2023, 0(4): 61-66.
[8] ZHANG Wuping. Serological Antibody Detection of Neospora Caninum from Dairy Cattle Farms in Some Areas of Fujian Province [J]. China Dairy, 2023, 0(12): 51-55.
[9] FU Taiyin, ZHOU Lei, WANG Hong, FANG YuBin, SUN Shumin. Basic Research on the Development of New Zealand Dairy Industry [J]. China Dairy, 2023, 0(11): 7-12.
[10] JIANG Bo. Prevention and Control of Bovine Tuberculosis [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(7): 63-67.
[11] ZHONG Beilei, PENG Chuanwen, CAO JIE. Risk Factors of Dystocia and Uterine Health in Dairy Cattle [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(6): 28-36.
[12] CAO Jie, PENG Chuanwen. Management of Uterine Health in Dairy Cattle [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(6): 11-15.
[13] ZHANG Shengli, SUN Dongxiao. Yesterday,Today and Tomorrow of Dairy Cattle Breeding [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(6): 3-10.
[14] HU Tingting, ZHANG Jinmeng, WANG Yichong, GUO Kaijun, HANG Renlong. Application of Big Data and IoT in Dairy Farming* [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(5): 29-33.
[15] JING Xuejin, JING Zhongping. Key Points Of Feeding And Management Of Dairy Cows In Perinatal Period [J]. China Dairy, 2021, 0(3): 27-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!