China Dairy ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 135-141.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.26.08.19

• LEGAL SYSTEM OF DAIRY INDUSTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Dilemmas and Pathways of Antitrust Regulation in China's Dairy Industry:Insights from the Infant Formula Price Case

DING Kaiming   

  1. School of Law,Harbin University of Commerce,Harbin Heilongjiang 150000; Beijing Academy of Lawyers Law,Beijing 100000
  • Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-09-17

Abstract: The dairy industry possesses both agricultural production and industrial processing attributes, and its antitrust regulation has long faced institutional tensions between agricultural protection and the maintenance of competitive order. This paper focused on whether the agricultural exemption system under Article 69 of China's Anti-Monopoly Law applies to the dairy industry. From the perspective of industrial structure, this paper found that China's dairy market has gradually developed into an oligopolistic competitive structure dominated by a small number of large enterprises, which creates potential anticompetitive risks. Taking the Infant Formula Price-Fixing Case as a typical resale price maintenance (RPM) case, this article argues that the formal identification of vertical agreements may conceal the essence of horizontal coordination, revealing limitations in the current enforcement approach. By clarifying the scope of application of Article 69, improving the regulatory framework for resale price maintenance, and incorporating structural guidance and behavioral constraints at the competition policy level, this paper aimed to achieve a balance between enhancing industrial efficiency and safeguarding market competition, thereby promoting the high-quality development of China's dairy industry.

Key words: Dairy Industry Antitrust Regulation, high-quality development of the dairy industry, agricultural exemption, resale price maintenance

[1] 雷希.《反垄断法》农业适用除外主体研究——关于《反垄断法》第56条的修法建议[J].农业经济问题,2021(12):116-125.
[2] 段宏磊,邱隽思.《反垄断法》中农业适用除外条款的审视与修正[J].知识产权与市场竞争研究,2020(1):149-160.
[3] 刘怡.反垄断法农业适用除外制度的行为要件研究[J].法律适用,2023(8):62-73.
[4] 邱隽思.反垄断法农业适用除外制度研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2022.
[5] 中国奶业统计年鉴编辑委员会.中国奶业统计年鉴2025[R].北京:中国农业出版社,2025.
[6] 郭传凯.寡头市场协同行为的反垄断法应对[J].现代法学,2024,46(5):115-130.
[7] 合生元等乳粉生产企业违反《反垄断法》限制竞争行为共被处罚6.6873亿元[EB/OL].[2013-08-07].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/xwfb/201308/t20130807_956179.html.
[8] 焦海涛.反垄断法上的竞争损害与消费者利益标准[J].南大法学,2022(2):1-17.
[9] 郭传凯.实质主义认定标准下转售价格维持的类型化认定[J].政治与法律,2024(4):45-59.
[10] 许光耀.转售价格维持案件中垄断行为的识别——兼评新《反垄断法》第18条[J].法学评论,2023,41(3):68-79.
[11] 王宇骅.中国乳品产业链纵向整合研究[D].武汉:中南财经政法大学,2022.
[12] 王晓晔.《反垄断法(修正草案)》的评析[J].当代法学,2022,36(3):36-51.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!