Abstract: Monopolistic behavior is very harmful to the market order of free competition,and whether civil disputes arising from anti-monopoly behaviors can be resolved through arbitration procedures are resolved in different ways in practice. The arbitration procedure is voluntary,flexible and professional,and the inclusion of anti-monopoly disputes in the arbitration procedure can not only give full play to the advantages of the arbitration procedure,but also resolve anti-monopoly dispute cases more efficiently and conveniently. This paper took Yili Industrial Group Co.,Ltd. as an example to analyze whether the arbitration clause agreed in the contract can still be applied to the lawsuit for confirmation of monopolistic behavior caused by the signing and performance of the contract between dairy enterprises,summarized the relevant experience,and provided relevant anti-monopoly experience for the conclusion of contract clauses between dairy enterprises in China,so as to create a more free,fair and orderly market atmosphere,so as to better promote the sustainable and healthy development of China's dairy market.

Key words: anti-monopoly, civil dispute, arbitrability