China Dairy ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 36-40.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.25.01.07

• FEEDING MANAGEMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Dietary Bacterial Enzyme Preparations on Blood Biochemical and Immune Indexes of Lactating Cows

ZHANG Jixi   

  1. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station,Diantou Town,Linshu County,Linyi Shandong 276700
  • Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-02-14

Abstract: [Objective] To study the effects of adding bacterial enzyme preparations to dairy cow diet on blood biochemical and immune indexes.[Method] A total of 200 healthy lactating cows with similar age and parity in a large-scale dairy farm were selected as the research objects and divided into 4 groups(n=50) by random number table method.They were divided into control group(basic diet),bacterial enzyme preparation group 1(basic diet+0.1% bacterial enzyme preparation) and bacterial enzyme preparation group 2(basic diet+0.2% bacterial enzyme preparation) and bacterial enzyme preparation group 3(basic diet+0.3% bacterial enzyme preparation ). Each group was set with 5 replicates and 10 lactating cows per replicate.The pre-test period lasted for 7 days and the test period lasted for 42 days.The blood biochemical and immune indexes of lactating cows in each group were analyzed statistically.[Result] ALT,TBIL,CK,ALB,BUN,Na,P,Ca and other blood biochemical indexes of lactating cows in bacterial enzyme preparation group 1,group 2 and group 3 were better than those in control group(P<0.05). The blood biochemical indexes of bacterial enzyme preparation group 2 were the best.There was no significant difference in IgM,IgG and TNF-α in control group,bacterial enzyme preparation group 1,group 2 and group 3(P> 0.05). IgA in bacterial enzyme preparation group 2 was higher than that group 1,group 3 and control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between bacterial enzyme preparation group 1 and group 3(P>0.05).IL-2 in bacterial enzyme preparation group 1,group 2 and group 3 were higher than that in control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in IL-2 in group 1,group 2 and group 3(P>0.05).[Conclusion] Bacterial enzyme preparation could improve the blood biochemical indexes of lactating cows and enhance the immune capacity of the body,and 0.2% was the most suitable addition.

Key words: bacterial enzyme preparation, lactating cow, blood biochemical index, immune index

[1] 张智. 竹叶提取物对奶牛泌乳量、乳成分、血液指标的影响[J].中国乳业,2023(10):52-55,60.
[2] 张海博,郭刚,申跃宇,等.饲粮中添加不同脂肪来源对围产后期奶牛生产性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J].中国饲料,2023(19):80-86.
[3] 南冰禹,李微,臧长江,等.烟酰胺对泌乳奶牛血液指标、抗氧化及抗炎能力的影响[J].饲料工业,2023,44(23):77-83.
[4] 任帅,沈宜钊,徐宏建,等.单宁提取物对泌乳早期荷斯坦奶牛生产性能、营养物质表观消化率和血液指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2023,35(9):5755-5764.
[5] 许芮婷,沈宜钊,李妍,等.不同酵母培养物对泌乳奶牛血液指标和瘤胃微生物的影响[J].饲料研究,2022,45(4):1-6.
[6] 姚凯勇,王迪铭.夏季高温条件下添加酵母培养物对奶牛生产性能和酮病风险的影响[J].中国奶牛,2023(7):39-43.
[7] 马瑞聪,陈治徽,徐晓锋,等.不同品质全株玉米青贮对泌乳奶牛生产性能、血液生化指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2023,59(11):254-258.
[8] 张国华,李强,金振华,等.过瘤胃葡萄糖对泌乳早期奶牛体况、血清生化指标、产奶量、乳成分的影响[J].中国饲料,2023(15):94-98.
[9] 申跃宇,郝科比,刘建业,等.泌乳奶牛日粮中添加不同比例脂肪酸对奶牛生产性能、血液生化指标的影响[J].中国饲料,2023(15):99-103.
[10] 赵俐辰,王晓芳,赵心念,等.树木遮阴对敞棚舍奶牛生理指标、泌乳性能及血液理化指标的影响[J].草业学报,2023,32(4):183-196.
[11] 熊莹槐,罗晓春,钱雪桥,等.复合酶制剂和复合菌制剂对凡纳滨对虾生长、体生化组成及能量收支的影响[J].海洋湖沼通报,2022,44(6):41-48.
[12] 张峰,赵义良,赵兴鑫,等.高青贮日粮对泌乳奶牛生产性能、生化指标及瘤胃pH值的影响[J].天津农业科学,2022,28(12):49-52.
[13] 陈东,武伟成,陈坤,等.全株水稻青贮替代全株玉米青贮对泌乳奶牛生产性能、血清生化指标、抗氧化能力和免疫能力的影响[J].中国饲料,2022(21):125-132.
[14] 黄佑倩,原雪峰,杨璐铭等. 菌酶制剂对肉羊生长性能、营养物质表观消化率及血清生化指标的影响[J].饲料研究,2024,47(19):12-17.
[15] 王强. 菌酶复合制剂对仔猪生长性能的影响[J].猪业科学,2023,40(7):73-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!