中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 176-180.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.11.28

• 乳业法制 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业反垄断纠纷的可仲裁性研究——以伊利实业集团股份有限公司为例

赵莉   

  1. 青海民族大学,青海西宁 810007
  • 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-12-10
  • 作者简介:赵 莉(1998-),女,河南驻马店人,在读硕士,研究方向为民商法。

Research on the Arbitrability of Enterprise Anti-monopoly Disputes--Taking Yili Industrial Group Co.,Ltd. as an Example

ZHAO Li   

  1. Qinghai Minzhu University, Xining Qinghai 810007
  • Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-12-10

摘要: 垄断行为对自由竞争市场秩序有很大危害性,而反垄断行程序解决,实践中有不同解决方式。仲裁程序具有自愿性、灵活性、专业性等特点,将反垄断纠纷纳入仲裁程序,不仅能很好发挥仲裁程序优越性,而且能更高效便捷处理反垄断纠纷案件。本文以伊利实业集团股份有限公司为例,分析合同签订、履行引发的确认垄断行为之诉是否适用合同约定仲裁条款,总结相关经验,为我国市场主体缔结合同条款提供反垄断经验,营造更自由、公平、有序市场,促进我国乳品市场持续健康发展。

关键词: 反垄断, 民事纠纷, 可仲裁性

Abstract: Monopolistic behavior is very harmful to the market order of free competition,and whether civil disputes arising from anti-monopoly behaviors can be resolved through arbitration procedures are resolved in different ways in practice. The arbitration procedure is voluntary,flexible and professional,and the inclusion of anti-monopoly disputes in the arbitration procedure can not only give full play to the advantages of the arbitration procedure,but also resolve anti-monopoly dispute cases more efficiently and conveniently. This paper took Yili Industrial Group Co.,Ltd. as an example to analyze whether the arbitration clause agreed in the contract can still be applied to the lawsuit for confirmation of monopolistic behavior caused by the signing and performance of the contract between dairy enterprises,summarized the relevant experience,and provided relevant anti-monopoly experience for the conclusion of contract clauses between dairy enterprises in China,so as to create a more free,fair and orderly market atmosphere,so as to better promote the sustainable and healthy development of China's dairy market.

Key words: anti-monopoly, civil dispute, arbitrability

[1] 童肖安图. 社会公共利益视角下垄断纠纷可仲裁性研究[J].华东政法大学学报,2021,24(3):171-184.
[2] 胡程航. 论反垄断纠纷的可仲裁性判断及实施机制[J].国际经济法学刊,2023(1):124-140.
[3] 杨秀清,史飚.《仲裁法学》[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2007.
[4] 孙晋,王贵.论反垄断纠纷可仲裁性的司法考量——兼评某垄断纠纷管辖权异议案[J].法律适用,2017(7):39-45.
[5] 刘依梦. 我国反垄断纠纷的可仲裁性研究[D].北京:中央财经大学,2022.
[6] 叶卫平.反垄断法的举证责任分配[J].法学,2016(11).(32-35)
[7] 张婷. 垄断纠纷可仲裁性研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2022.
[8] 吴如巧,王睿.试论我国仲裁裁决的司法审查及其规范[J].探求,2020(5):46-57.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!