乳业企业数据财产权作为一种新型权利,在财产权之上具有法律的引致条款,但却并没有足够明确的法律为其提供裁判依据,在新的利益诉求下,其中权利转化过程应以“确认”“定型”“论证”在裁判过程中层层递进,乳业企业的司法困境在一定程度上与法律关系的运用密切相关,若不当的适用法律方法,会对案件的裁判造成诸多影响,因此,要加强众多法律方法在司法实践中的应用。
As a new type of right, the data property right of dairy enterprises has a legal causing clause on the property right, but there is no clear enough law to provide judgment basis for it, among them, the process of rights transformation should be Confirmed, Stereotyped Argumentation in the process of judgment, and the judicial predicament of dairy enterprises is closely related to the application of legal relations to a certain extent, if the improper application of legal methods, the judgment of the case will create many impressions, therefore, we should strengthen the application of many legal methods in judicial practice.
[1] 姬蕾蕾. 企业数据纠纷的裁判规则研究——以数据类型化为视角[J].求是学刊,2023,50(2):135-150.
[2] [美]弗里德里克·肖尔.像法律人那样思考:法律推理新论[M].雷磊译.北京:中国法制出版社,2016.
[3] 冯晓青. 数据产权法律构造论[J].政法论丛,2024(1):120-136.
[4] 雷磊. 法教义学与法治:法教义学的治理意义[J].法学研究,2018(5):767.
[5] 孙光宁. 法律解释方法在指导性案例中的运用及其完善[J].中国法学,2018(1):99-101.
[6] 陈金钊. 过度解释与权利的绝对化[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2010,28(2):29-36.
[7] 孙跃. 指导性案例与抽象司法解释的互动及其完善[J].法学家,2020(2):103-117,194.
[8] 张斌峰,李杨.当代中国法律论证型式的示范性研究——基于“于德水案”的实证分析[J].学术交流,2016(9):77-82.