《民法典》第406条确认了抵押权的追及效力,但第403条动产抵押的登记对抗规则与第404条正常经营买受人规则会对动产抵押权的追及效力产生阻断效力。本文以辽宁辉山乳业集团有限公司三家子公司以未办理抵押登记的动产牛提供抵押为切入点,分析动产抵押权的追及效力的正当性,分析动产抵押权的追及效力在适用中易受阻断的情形与原因,对动产抵押权易受阻断的困境提出方法,破解《民法典》第403条、第404条、第406条之间的冲突。
Article 406 of the Civil Code confirms the tracing effect of the mortgage,but the tracing effect of the chattel mortgage is limited by the doctrine of filing antagonism of the chattel mortgage and the normal operation buyer rule of Article 404.This article took the three subsidiaries of Liaoning Huishan Dairy Group as the starting point to analyze the legitimacy of the tracing effect of chattel mortgage,and then analyzed the circumstances and reasons why the tracing effect of chattel mortgage was easily blocked,and proposed a method for the dilemma of the chattel mortgage being easily blocked,which was aimed at solving the conflict between Articles 403,404,and 406 of the Civil Code.
[1] 参见辽宁省高级人民法院(2019)民终1722号民事判决书https://www.jufaanli.com/detail/PVGzpbde/?q=%EF%BC%882019%EF%BC%89%E8%BE%BD%E6%B0%91%E7%BB%881722%E5%8F%B7&%EF%BC%882019%EF%BC%89%E8%BE%BD%E6%B0%91%E7%BB%881722%E5%8F%B7&src=search&k=&last_search_uuid=b4257f93bb4d95b40f8e6858c4d8acc4&level_id=2&p=&search_uuid=93be27f28a3a1bfc7b126389ce60f962.
[2] 王利明. 论抵押权的追及效力——以《民法典》第406条为中心[J].政法论丛,2023(1):15-26.
[3] 付晓雅. 《民法典》中质押权利不得转让的目的性限缩[J].法学杂志,2021,42(3):119-130.
[4] 陈本寒. 担保物权法比较研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003.
[5] 高圣平. 民法典动产担保权登记对抗规则的解释论[J].中外法学,2020,32(4):951-972.
[6] 陈玲林. 抵押动产转让中抵押权人利益保护研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023.
[7] 叶子曦. 一般动产抵押的法律困境和发展空间——以《民法典》第四百零六条为切入点[J].汉江师范学院学报,2021,41(1):44-49.
[8] 邹海林. 民法典上的动产抵押权规则体系解释论[J].法律适用,2021(5):28-37.
[9] 杨广燊. 商业银行逾期贷款抵押物处置法律风险研究[D].广州:广东财经大学,2023.
