中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 105-110.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.09.18

• 乳业法制 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共事件中行政执法的优化路径研究——以奶业事件为例

钱科婷   

  1. 青海民族大学,青海西宁 810007
  • 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-09-30
  • 作者简介:钱科婷(2000-),女,浙江宁波人,硕士,研究方向为宪法与行政法学。

Research on the Optimization Path of Administrative Law Enforcement in Public Events--Taking the Dairy Industry Incidents as Examples

QIAN Keting   

  1. Qinghai Minzu University,Xining Qinghai 810007
  • Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-09-30

摘要: 中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第三次全体会议确定推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化作为全面深化改革的总目标。行政执法视为国家治理效能的重要表现,其何以在公共事件中彰显,成为当下社会发展亟需重视的现实问题。从三鹿奶粉事件到麦趣尔牛奶事件,行政执法仍面临一定冲突:一方面,社会公共利益与公民个人权利之间存在某种张力;另一方面,执法制度的稳定性难以应对公共事件复杂性的旁逸斜出。因此,本文建议由刚性执法转向柔性执法、从传统执法转向创新执法的路径优化,确保行政执法制度优势转化为治理现代化优势。

关键词: 三鹿奶粉事件, 麦趣尔牛奶事件, 行政执法, 路径优化

Abstract: The Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China established the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity as the overarching goal for comprehensive deepening of reforms. Administrative enforcement is a critical indicator of national governance efficacy,highlighting its significance in today’s society. This is especially evident in public incidents such as the Sanlu milk powder crisis and the Maquieur milk crisis,where administrative enforcement still face certain challenges: the tension between public interest and citizen rights,and a string of public struggles due to the instability of enforcement mechanisms. In light of the above issues, this paper suggests an optimized approach that shifts from rigid law enforcement to flexible law enforcement, and from traditional law enforcement to innovative law enforcement, in order to ensure that the administrative law enforcement system is transformed into the modern governance.

Key words: Sanlu milk powder crisis, the Maquieur milk crisis, administrative enforcement, the optimized approach

[1] 新华网.麦趣尔因“丙二醇事件”被罚7315万元[EB/OL].https://app.xinhuanet.com/news/article.html?articleId=692c2a79031b2564d3dba56ee5e12e09.2024-06-28.
[2] E·博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[3] 昌吉市人民政府网.行政处罚决定书昌市市监处罚〔2022〕71号[EB/OL].https://www.cjs.gov.cn/gk/lmq/910524.htm,2024-04-08.
[4] 叶玲珍.麦趣尔因“丙二醇事件”被罚7 315 万元[N].证券时报,2022-08-23(A06).
[5] 张振华. 三鹿奶粉案:引发乳业食品安全危机[J].方圆,2019(27):96-99.
[6] 王贵松. 风险行政的预防原则[J].比较法研究,2021(1):49-61.
[7] 罗豪才,宋功德.认真对待软法——公域软法的一般理论及其中国实践[J].中国法学,2006(2):3-24.
[8] 罗豪才,周强.法治政府建设中的软法治理[J].江海学刊,2016(1):125-130.
[9] 魏文松. 行政执法应对突发公共事件的风险冲突及其价值平衡[J].中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报,2023(5):89-97.
[10] 王硕. 我国食品安全行政执法模式研究[D].吉林:长春理工大学,2016.
[1] 杨艳芬, 李阳, 石欣欣. 东营市奶业高质量发展及路径优化研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 78-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!