中国乳业 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 10-16.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.25.04.02

• 营销管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

ESG视角下综合绩效评价研究——以伊利股份为例

师佳丽   

  1. 青海民族大学,青海西宁 810000
  • 发布日期:2025-05-08
  • 作者简介:师佳丽(1999-),女,山西晋中人,在读硕士,研究方向为企业会计 。

ESG-based Integrated Performance Assessment:Evidence from Yili Group

SHI Jiali   

  1. Qinghai Minzu University,Xining Qinghai 810000
  • Published:2025-05-08

摘要: 在全球可持续发展理念深化和低碳转型加速的背景下,ESG标准已成为评估企业综合绩效的重要框架。作为乳制品行业的龙头企业,伊利股份的ESG实践具有典型研究价值。因此本文以伊利股份为例,基于ESG视角构建了包含财务、环境、社会及治理四个维度的综合绩效评价体系,并运用熵值法对2019—2023年的相关数据进行了权重计算与得分分析。研究结果显示,财务指标在绩效评价中占据主导地位(权重41.16%),而环境、社会和治理维度的表现虽有提升空间,但对整体绩效的贡献逐渐显现。2021年伊利股份的综合得分显著提升,主要得益于财务和社会维度的双重驱动。此外,伊利在环境管理、社会责任履行和公司治理方面的实践具有行业标杆意义,但也存在员工安全事故等需改进的问题。本文为同类企业优化ESG管理、实现可持续发展提供了理论参考与实践借鉴。

关键词: ESG, 综合绩效评价, 伊利股份

Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deepening global sustainability concept and the accelerating low-carbon transition,ESG standards have become a crucial framework for evaluating corporate comprehensive performance. As a leading enterprise in the dairy industry,Yili Group's ESG practices hold significant research value. Therefore,this study takes Yili Group as an example and constructs a comprehensive performance evaluation system based on the ESG perspective,encompassing four dimensions:financial,environmental,social,and governance. The entropy method is employed to calculate weights and analyze scores for relevant data from 2019 to 2023.The results reveal that financial indicators dominate the performance evaluation (with a weight of 41.16%),while the environmental,social,and governance dimensions,though with room for improvement,are increasingly contributing to overall performance. In 2021,Yili Group's comprehensive score saw a notable increase,primarily driven by the dual boost from financial and social dimensions. Additionally,Yili's practices in environmental management,social responsibility fulfillment,and corporate governance serve as industry benchmarks,though issues such as employee safety incidents require further attention.This study provides theoretical references and practical insights for peer companies to optimize ESG management and achieve sustainable development.

Key words: ESG, comprehensive performance evaluation, Yili Group

[1] Friede G,Busch T,Bassen A.ESG and financial performance:aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies[J]. Journal of Sustainable Finance&Investment,2015,5(4):210-233.
[2] 高杰英,褚冬晓,廉永辉,等.ESG 表现能改善企业投资效率吗?[J].证券市场导报,2021(11):24-34,72.
[3] 王琳璘,廉永辉,董捷.ESG 表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J].证券市场导报,2022(05):23-34.
[4] 姜启军,贺卫.企业社会责任的战略选择与民营企业的可持续发展[J].商业经济与管理,2005(11):51-56.
[5] 宋晓娜,张峰.社会责任履行对高新技术企业竞争力影响的检验[J].统计与决策,2020 ,36(12):170-172.
[6] 徐光华,卓瑶瑶,张艺萌,等.ESG 信息披露会提高企业价值吗?[J].财会通讯,2022(4):33-37.
[7] 刘江伟. 公司可持续性与ESG披露构建研究[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):104-111.
[8] 黄中生,董必荣.关于上市公司信息披露的战略思考[J].南京审计学院学报,2015,12(4):81-88.
[9] 苏淑娴,郑冰.“双碳”背景下中国乳业发展现状及对策研究[J].中国乳业,2024(9):21-25.
[1] 刘桂秀. 伊利股份短视频营销的成效与优化路径研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2025, 0(2): 50-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!