中国乳业 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 87-95.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.26.02.14

• 质量安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于培养法与16SrRNA测序的华北地区规模化牧场原料乳嗜冷菌多样性综合分析

杨波1,3, 栗慧1,2,3, 王青山3, 武二斌4, 魏东1,2,3,*   

  1. 1.河北北方学院河北省农产品食品质量安全分析检测重点实验室,河北张家口 075000;
    2.河北北方学院张家口特色农产品质量安全重点实验室,河北张家口 075000;
    3.河北北方学院农林科技学院,河北张家口 075000;
    4.张家口市动物卫生监督所,河北张家口 075000
  • 发布日期:2026-03-20
  • 通讯作者: *魏 东(1971-),男,河北张家口人,博士,研究员,研究方向为药物残留检测。
  • 作者简介:杨 波(1987-),男,河北石家庄人,在读硕士,研究方向为食品加工与安全;栗 慧(1992-),女,河北张家口人,硕士,助理研究员,研究方向为食品加工与安全;王青山(1982-),男,河北石家庄人,在读硕士,研究方向为食品加工与安全;武二斌(1976-),男,河北张家口人,本科,推广研究员,研究方向为畜禽标准化养殖技术。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省农产品食品质量安全分析检测重点实验室绩效补助经费项目(22567613H); 河北省农业科技成果转化资金项目(2025JNZ-S22)

Comprehensive Analysis of the Diversity of Psychrotrophic Bacteria in Raw Milk of Large-scale Dairy Farms in North China Based on the Culture Method and 16S rRNA Sequencing

YANG Bo1,3, LI Hui1,2,3, WANG Qingshan3, WU Erbin4, WEI Dong1,2,3,*   

  1. 1. Hebei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products and Food Quality Safety Analysis and Testing,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou Hebei 075000;
    2. Zhangjiakou Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Characteristic Agricultural Products,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou Hebei 075000;
    3. College of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology,Hebei North University,Zhangjiakou Hebei 075000;
    4. Zhangjiakou Animal Health Supervision Institute,Zhangjiakou Hebei 075000
  • Published:2026-03-20

摘要: [目的]调查不同牧场、不同生产时间乳制品原料中嗜冷菌菌群结构组成和嗜冷微生物多样性。[方法]采集36 份华北地区规模化牧场原料乳样品,利用16S rRNA测序与传统分离培养的方法,探讨不同牧场在不同季节生产的原料乳中菌群结构的变化关系以及嗜冷菌的多样性。[结果]利用传统培养技术对36 份样品中的嗜冷菌进行分离和鉴定,共归类到23 个属和474 个种,其中假单胞菌属、不动杆菌属、黄杆菌属、莱茵海默氏菌、嗜冷杆菌属及肠杆菌属在属水平的占比依次递减。嗜冷菌的浓度范围在1.71~3.78 lgCFU/mL之间,平均浓度为2.79 lgCFU/mL。36 份样品利用16S rRNA扩增子测序分析共注释到37 门、90 纲、214 目、358 科、740 属和12 301 种,微生物多样性丰度前十的优势属为不动杆菌、埃希氏菌属、代尔夫特食酸菌、产气单胞菌属、假单胞菌属、UCG-005菌属、链球菌属、普拉梭菌、棒杆菌属、黄杆菌属。[结论]嗜冷菌的浓度和微生物多样性在不同牧场、不同时间生产原料乳中嗜冷菌菌群结构组成和嗜冷微生物的多样性差异较大。本研究为华北地区原料乳中嗜冷菌微生物多样性的理论研究提供依据,为华北地区牧场制定差异化嗜冷菌防控策略提供了数据支持。

关键词: 嗜冷菌, 原料乳, 微生物多样性

Abstract: [Objective] To investigate the composition of psychrotrophic bacterial communities and the diversity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in dairy raw materials from different pastures and at different production times.[Method] 36 raw milk samples were collected from large-scale pastures in North China.To investigate the alterations in bacterial community composition and the variety of psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk from various pastures and seasons, researchers employed both 16SrRNA sequencing and conventional isolation and culture techniques.[Result] From the 36 samples,psychrotrophic bacteria were obtained and classified through conventional culturing techniques,identifying 474 species across 23 genera. At the genus level,the proportions were in the order of Pseudomonas,Acinetobacter,Flavobacterium,Rheinheimera,Psychrobacter,and Enterobacter. The concentration of psychrotrophic bacteria ranged from 1.71 to 3.78 lgCFU/mL,with an average concentration of 2.79 lgCFU/mL. Analysis of the 36 samples using 16SrRNA amplicon sequencing annotated a total of 37 phyla,90 classes,214 orders,358 families,740 genera and 12 301 species. The top 10 dominant genera in terms of microbial diversity abundance were Acinetobacter,Escherichia,Delftia acidovorans,Aeromonas,Pseudomonas,UCG-005,Streptococcus,Faecalibacterium,Corynebacterium and Flavobacterium.[Conclusion] Substantial variations were observed in the levels of psychrotrophic bacteria,the structure of psychrotrophic bacterial communities and the diversity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in raw milk sourced from various pastures and at various times. This research lays the groundwork for theoretical investigations into the microbial variety of psychrotrophic bacteria found in raw milk in Northern China and supplies data assistance for farms in the area to develop tailored strategies for managing and preventing psychrotrophic bacteria.

Key words: psychrotrophic bacteria, raw milk, microbial diversity

[1] Dai L,Hu S,Pang X,et al.Community diversity of psychrophilic bacteria in dairy farm raw milk and its characteristic enzyme production at different temperature[J].Food Bioscience,2023,54:102921.
[2] Ahmed S,Sumon S M,Hossain M,et al.Prevalence of psychrotrophic bacteria during frozen storage of raw milk[J].Annals of Bangladesh Agriculture,2021,24(1):65-76.
[3] Du B,Meng L,Liu H,et al.Single Molecule real-time sequencing and traditional cultivation techniques reveal complex community structures and regional variations of psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2022(13):853263.
[4] Yuan L,Sadiq F A,Liu T,et al.Psychrotrophic bacterial populations in Chinese raw dairy milk[J].Food Science & Technology,2017(84):409-418.
[5] Dees P M,Ghiorse W C.Microbial diversity in hot synthetic compost as revealed by PCR-amplified rRNA sequences from cultivated isolates and extracted DNA[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2001,35(2):207-216.
[6] 谭利涛,成胜,苏杭,等.真菌内生蜡样芽孢杆菌7-1y的分离鉴定及其功能探索[J].江西农业大学学报,2022,44(4):900-909.
[7] 祁腾,张凤,韩英,等.西北地区各牧场中嗜冷微生物多样性研究[J].中国乳品工业,2024,52(12):23-29.
[8] 李兰君,刘玳含,刘建斌,等.连作对设施番茄土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(18):130-134.
[9] 代良超.原料乳中嗜冷菌对UHT乳品质及货架期的影响研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2023.
[10] 卢延想.高温大曲中产香微生物的筛选及应用研究[D].天津:天津科技大学,2021.
[11] 谢宪,邓勋,宋丽文,等.落叶松枯梢病罹病叶及病梢真菌多样性[J].林业科学,2024,60(10):76-85.
[12] 尚婷婷,孟军,曾亚琦,等.新生伊犁马马驹后肠道微生物母源传递特征的研究[J].动物营养学报,2024,36(9):5860-5871.
[13] Bokulich N A,Subramanian S,Faith J J,et al.Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from illumina amplicon sequencing[J].Nature Methods,2013,10(1):57-59.
[14] Edgar R C,Haas B J,Clemente J C,et al.UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection[J].Bioinformatics,2011,27(16):2194-2200.
[15] 郭小杰.原料乳中嗜冷菌多样性及其主要水解酶特性研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2020.
[16] 杨振泉,周海波,高璐,等.超声波协同流水净化对克氏原螯虾中菌落总数及菌相构成的影响[J].食品科学,2015,36(17):173-178.
[17] 简程芳,张博宇,王存萍,等.藏族药二十五味松石丸调控肠道菌群改善非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的作用机制研究[J].中国中药杂志,2022,47(8):2038-2048.
[18] Zhuang J,Hou Y,Wang Y,et al.Relationship between microorganisms and milk metabolites during quality changes in refrigerated raw milk:A metagenomic and metabolomic exploration[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2024(425):110891.
[19] Wang Y,Han X,Chen X,et al.Potential harmful of extracellular proteases secreted by Pseudomonas fluorescens W3 on milk quality[J].Journal of Food Processing and Preservation,2021,45(3):e15192.
[20] Aouadhi C,Tbarki R,Boukari W,et al.Impact of psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk on the quality and stability of UHT milk in Tunisia[J].International Dairy Journal,2025(167):106262.
[21] 中国奶业协会.T/DAC003-2017 中国奶业协会团体标准学生饮用奶生牛乳[S].
[22] Qin X,Cheng J,Qiu Y,et al.Characterization of psychrotrophic and thermoduric bacteria in raw milk using a multi-omics approach[J].Microbial Genomics,2024,10(11):1-13.
[23] Clements R S,Wyatt D M,Symons M H,et al.Inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of pseudomonas fluorescens proteases in ultrahigh-temperature-treated milk[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1990,56(4):1188-1190.
[24] Druce R G,Thomas S B.An ecological study of the psychrotrophic bacteria of soil,water,grass and hay[J].Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1970,33(2):420-435.
[25] Vithanage N R,Yeager T R,Jadhav S R,et al.Comparison of identification systems for psychrotrophic bacteria isolated from raw bovine milk[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2014(189):26-38.
[26] Porcellato D,Aspholm M,Skeie S B,et al.Microbial diversity of consumption milk during processing and storage[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2018(266):21-30.
[27] Li N,Wang Y,You C,et al.Variation in raw milk microbiota throughout 12 months and the impact of weather conditions[J].Scientific Reports, 2018,8(1):2371.
[28] 吕元,叶兴乾.杭州地区原料奶中嗜冷菌的分离鉴定[J].中国乳品工业,2012,40(3):43-46.
[1] 周欢, 宋艳梅, 范光彩, 夏忠悦, 马静, 骆敏. 原料乳理化及微生物指标与蛋白酶活力的相关性研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2026, 0(2): 48-54.
[2] 吴思敏, 谢翠连, 林秋莹, 傅金凤. 不同培养条件下原料牛乳嗜冷菌检测结果的差异影响研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2025, 0(12): 52-58.
[3] 王帅, 郑楠, 王富兰, 赵艳坤, 武亚婷, 马宪兰, 李新霞, 陈贺, 王夕虎, 童刚平, 李跟笑, 郭孝敬. 原料乳优质乳工程核心指标分析——以新疆西域春乳业为例[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(5): 110-116.
[4] 张鹏博, 李智星, 魏勇, 张逸雪, 刘文楷, 蒋松. 不同检测时间对原料乳中嗜冷菌检测结果的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(1): 77-80.
[5] 胡少震, 李莲瑞. 变质原料乳中假单胞菌的分离鉴定及产蛋白酶特性研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(10): 77-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!