中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 69-73.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.11.12

• 智慧养殖专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

评估从干奶到产犊的体况评分动态对荷斯坦奶牛泌乳早期疾病发病率的影响

李胜楠, 郭凯军*   

  1. 北京农学院,北京 100096
  • 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-12-10
  • 通讯作者: *郭凯军(1973-),男,河南西平人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 作者简介:李胜楠(2002-),女,天津人,硕士,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 基金资助:
    北京市家畜创新团队项目(BAIC05-2024)

Assessing the Impact of Body Condition Score Dynamics from Dry-off to Calving on the Incidence of Early Lactation Disease in Holstein Cows

LI Shengnan, GUO Kaijun*   

  1. Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100096
  • Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-12-10

摘要: [目的] 通过图像技术自动生成体况评分(BCS)的系统能够以高效且无应激的方式对奶牛的体能储备进行每日评估,并生成客观信息。高频BCS数据可用于分析特定的关注点,并在必要时快速调整饲养管理方式。本研究的目的是评估高产荷斯坦奶牛群体从干奶到产犊时的BCS动态与泌乳早期疾病之间的关联。使用2019年4月—2022年1月在美国科罗拉多州一家商业奶牛场产犊的7 626 头荷斯坦牛的12 042 次泌乳中收集的数据完成回顾性观察性研究。[方法] 选择干奶(BCSdry)和产犊(BCScalv)奶牛由BCS相机(DeLavalInternationalAB,瑞典Tumba)生成间隔0.1的评分,随后分别针对初产牛和经产牛进行四分位数分类(Q1=最低BCS)。从干奶时到产犊时的 BCS变化计算为BCScalv-BCSdry,并分配到四分位数类别,其中 Q1被视为损失最大的 25%的奶牛。奶牛被归类为健康(HLT;无健康事件)或产后 60 天内至少受一种健康疾病影响(SCK)。健康问题包括繁殖问题(胎衣不下、子宫炎和子宫囊肿),代谢问题(临床低钙血症、亚临床酮病和左侧真胃移位)和其他问题(跛行、临床乳房炎、消化问题、受伤和肺炎)。[结果] HLT与SCK之间的平均(SE)BCSdry为3.38(0.004)与3.42(0.004)(P<0.0001),而BCScalv为3.30(0.003)与3.33(0.003)(P<0.0001)。HLT与SCK之间的平均BCS在干奶时和产犊时之间的差异为-0.088(0.004)与-0.11(0.005)(P=0.008)。逻辑回归分析表明,相对于BCS值最高的类别(Q4),BCS值较低的干奶牛患病几率(95%CI)较低:Q1=0.78(0.65~0.94);Q2=0.75(0.62~0.90);Q3=0.79(0.65~0.96)。相反,BCScalv类别与泌乳早期疾病无关(P=0.48)。从干奶时到产犊时BCS降低与随后的疾病有关,BCS上升的奶牛(Q4)相比,BCS下降较多(Q1和Q2)的奶牛患病几率更高:Q1=1.32 (1.11~1.58)和 Q2=1.35(1.14~1.61)。[结论] 干奶时BCS以及干奶时至产犊时BCS的显著下降对早期泌乳期疾病的发生有显著影响。

关键词: 体况评分, 自动化, 健康

Abstract: [Objective] Automated systems generating body condition scores (BCS) through image technology enable daily assessments of body energy reserves of dairy cows in an efficient non stressful approach and generate objective information. The availability of high-frequency BCS data allows for the analysis of specific points of interest and could result in quick adjustments of management if necessary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the dynamics of BCS from dry-off to calving and early lactation disease in a population of high-producing Holstein cows. [Method] A retrospective observational study was completed using data collected from 12 042 lactations in 7 626 Holstein cows calving between April 2019 and January 2022 in a commercial dairy operation located in Colorado, USA. Scores generated by BCS cameras (DeLaval International AB, Tumba, Sweden), at 0.1 point intervals, at dry-off (BCSdry) and calving (BCScalv) were selected for the analysis and subsequently categorized into quartiles (Q1 = lowest BCS), separately for primiparous and multiparous cows. The change in BCS from dry-ff to calving was calculated as BCScalv - BCSdry and assigned into quartile categories considering Q1 as the 25% of cows with greatest loss. Cows were classified as healthy (HLT; no health event) or affected by at least one health disorder within 60 days postpartum (SCK). Health disorders included reproductive (retained fetal membranes, metritis, and pyometra), metabolic (clinical hypocalcemia, subclinical ketosis, and left displaced abomasum), and other conditions (lameness, clinical mastitis, digestive problem, injury, and pneumonia). [Result] Mean (SE) BCSdry for HLT vs. SCK were 3.38 (0.004) vs. 3.42 (0.004)(P<0.000 1), while BCScalv for HLT vs. SCK were 3.30 (0.003) vs. 3.33 (0.003)(P <0.000 1). Mean BCS differences between dry-off and calving for HLT vs. SCK were -0.088 (0.004) vs. -0.11 (0.005) (P= 0.0008). The logistic regression analyses indicated that the odds (95% CI) of disease were smaller in the lower BCSdry categories relative to cows in the highest BCS category (Q4): Q1 = 0.78 (0.65-0.94); Q2 = 0.75 (0.62-0.90); Q3 = 0.79 (0.65-0.96). On the contrary, BCScalv category was not associated with early lactation disease (P= 0.48). Reductions in BCS from dry off to calving were associated with subsequent disease, as cows losing more BCS (Q1 and Q2) had greater odds of disease compared to cows gaining BCS (Q4): Q1 = 1.32 (1.11-1.58) and Q2 = 1.35 (1.14-1.61). [Conclusion] BCS at dry-off and greater loss of BCS between dry-off and calving had a significant impact on occurrence of early lactation disease.

Key words: body condition, automated, health

[1] Ferguson J D,Galligan D T,Thomsen N.Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1994,77(9):2695-2703.
[2] Roche J R,Macdonald K A,Burke C R,et al.Associations among body condition score, body weight, and reproductive performance in seasonal-calving dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(1):376-391.
[3] Roche J R,Friggens N C,Kay J K,et al.Invited review:Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity,health,and welfare[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2009, 92(12):5769-5801.
[4] Hady P J,Domecq J J.and Kaneene J B.Frequency and precision of body condition scoring in dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1994,77(6):1543-1547.
[5] Bewley J M,Boehlje M D,Gray A W,et al.Assessing the potential value for an automated dairy cattle body condition scoring system through stochastic simulation[J].Agricultural Finance Review,2010,70(1):126-150.
[6] Edmondson A J,Lean I J,Weaver L D,et al.A body condition scoring chart for Holstein cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1989,72(1):68-78.
[7] Leroy T,Aerts J M,Eeman J,et al.Automatic determination of body condition score of cowsbased on 2D images[A].Cox S.Precision Livestock Farming[C].Sweden:Wageningen Academic Publishers,2005.
[8] Borchers M R and Bewley J M. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use,prepurchase considerations,and usefulness[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(6):4198-4205.
[9] Pinedo P,Manríquez D,Azocar J,et al.Dynamics of automatically generated body condition scores during early lactation and pregnancy at first artificial insemination of Holstein cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2022,105(5):4547-4564.
[10] Pinedo P J,Manríquez D,Ciarletta C,et al.Association between body condition score fluctuations and pregnancy loss in Holstein cows[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2022, 100(10).
[11] Carvalho P D,Souza A H,Amundson M C,et al.Relationships between fertility and postpartum changes in body condition and body weight in lactating dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2014,97:3666-3683.
[12] Chebel R C,Mendonca L G D,Baruselli P S,et al. Association between body condition score change during the dry period and postpartum health and performance[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101:4595-4614.
[13] Daros R R,Havekes C D,DeVries T J . Body condition loss during the dry period:Insights from feeding behavior studies[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2021,104:4682-4691.
[14] Stevenson J S,Banuelos S,Mendonca L G D. Transition dairy cow health is associated with first postpartum ovulation risk,metabolic status,milk production,rumination,and physical activity[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2020,103(10):9573-9586.
[15] Mullins I L,Truman C M,Campler M R,et al.Validation of a commercial automated body condition scoring system on a commercial dairy farm[J]. Animals(Basel),2019,9(6):287.
[16] Truman C M,Campler M R,Costa J H C.Body condition score change throughout lactation utilizing an automated BCS system:A descriptive study[J]. Animals(Basel),2022,12(5):601.
[17] Contreras L L,Ryan C M,Overton T R.Effects of dry cow grouping strategy and prepartum body condition score on performance and health of transition dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2004,87(2):517-523.
[1] 王国骄, 洪青, 刘振民, 王吉栋, 雍靖怡. 益生菌发酵乳对机体健康作用的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 106-110.
[2] 林清香, 王西耀, 刘冬梅. 补饲过瘤胃蛋氨酸对围产期奶牛健康及生产性能影响的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(3): 13-17.
[3] 姚秀丽. 发酵床对奶牛健康状况和生产性能的影响研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 20-24.
[4] 冯安学. 分群门技术在大型牧场中应用的前提条件与生产价值[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(11): 35-39.
[5] 解妙妙, 郭凯军. 利用自动数据交换技术优化饲料效率的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(11): 61-63.
[6] 徐源, 郭凯军. 动物健康和福利传感器数据:现状和未来应用[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(11): 74-79.
[7] 刘浩, 韩萌, 林立军, 王晶. 中国牧业60强奶牛健康养殖分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(7): 57-63.
[8] 史文辉, 段丽琴. 《奶牛健康与牧场管理》实践课程改革研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(6): 18-22.
[9] 朱栩漫, 朱泳. 新消费时代乳制品减糖的发展契机及策略研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(5): 7-11.
[10] 巩立书, 张明凤. 乳制品营养价值与健康效益的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(11): 13-17.
[11] 尹红力, 刘慧, 佟丽丽, 杨雪, 李彤, 唐嘉瞳, 张洪涛. 乳制品与人类健康[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(11): 18-22.
[12] 哈布拉. 羊乳制品营养价值和健康功能研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(11): 23-26.
[13] 吴赫云, 郑玺, 解玲娜. 在极端温度条件下犊牛饲喂代乳粉的策略研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(6): 28-30.
[14] 杨利基, 夏青, 张琴妹, 张晓慧, 赖霞, 葛鑫. 南方规模奶牛场胎衣滞留发病规律研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(4): 61-67.
[15] 吴心华, 马晓霞, 蒲罡. 犊牛健康管理[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(4): 23-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!