中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 20-24.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.02.04

• 饲养管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

发酵床对奶牛健康状况和生产性能的影响研究

姚秀丽   

  1. 张北县职教中心,河北张家口 076450
  • 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-27
  • 作者简介:姚秀丽(1982-),女,河北张家口人,硕士,讲师,研究方向为畜禽生产技术。

Effect of Fermentation Bed on Health Status and Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows

YAO Xiuli   

  1. Zhangbei Vocational Education Center, Zhangjiakou Hebei 076450
  • Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-27

摘要: [目的]探索发酵床对奶牛健康状况和生产性能的影响。[方法]试验设发酵床组与水泥地面组,各选健康奶牛21 头,通过对奶牛牛体和乳房卫生情况、生产性能、牛舍环境、血常规和血液生化指标、躺卧情况及健康状况等指标进行评估。[结果]发酵床组牛体和乳房卫生情况明显优于水泥地面组;体细胞数显著低于水泥地面组(P<0.05);发酵床组牛舍相对湿度显著高于水泥地面组(P<0.05);发酵床组牛舍氨气浓度显著低于水泥地面组(P<0.05);发酵床组血液葡萄糖含量显著高于水泥地面组(P<0.05);发酵床组奶牛躺卧率明显高于水泥地面组(P<0.05);发酵床组乳房炎和肢蹄病发病率显著低于水泥地面组(P<0.05)。[结论]发酵床不仅能提高奶牛牛体和乳房卫生,还能降低乳房炎和肢蹄病发生率,改善奶牛生产性能。

关键词: 发酵床, 奶牛, 健康状况, 生产性能

Abstract: [Objective] To explore the effects of fermentation bed on the health status and production performance of dairy cows. [Methods] A fermentation bed group and a cement floor group were set up, and 21 healthy cows were selected from each group. The health condition of the body and udder, production performance, barn environment, blood routine and blood biochemical indexes, lying condition and health status of the cows were evaluated. [Results] The health condition of the body and udder of the fermented bed group was better than that of the cement floor group. The somatic cell count was significantly lower than that of cement floor group (P<0.05). The relative humidity of the barn in fermentation bed group was significantly higher than that in cement floor group (P<0.05). The concentration of ammonia in fermentation bed group was significantly lower than that in cement floor group (P<0.05). The blood glucose content of fermented bed group was significantly higher than that of cement floor group (P<0.05). The lying rate of cows in fermentation bed group was significantly higher than that in cement floor group (P<0.05). The incidence of mastitis and foot and foot disease in fermented bed group was significantly lower than that in cement floor group (P<0.05). [Conclusion] Fermentation bed can not only improve the body and udder hygiene of dairy cows, but also reduce the incidence of mastitis and foot and foot disease, and improve the production performance of dairy cows.

Key words: fermentation bed, cows, state of health, production performance

[1] 鲁百奇. 河北省不同规模奶牛养殖效益问题研究[D].荆州:长江大学,2022.
[2] 李芳芳,潘堂峰,肖丽华,等. 农作物秸秆发酵床养殖模式对河流型水牛产奶性能及生理指标的影响[J]. 贵州畜牧兽医,2022,46(1):20-23.
[3] 樊海花,黄明优,韦志柳,等. 牛场“微生物+垫料发酵床”生态养殖模式探索[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2022,18(5):140-142.
[4] 韦兰锋,李凌波,蒙善朝. 不同发酵床垫料原料及水泥地面栏舍育肥肉牛的对比试验[J]. 广西畜牧兽医,2022,38(5):221-222.
[5] 叶健强,康润敏,谢晶,等. 发酵床养猪的优势和劣势分析[J].四川畜牧兽医,2023,50(2):32-34,36.
[6] 岳立,宋红卫,吴卫东. 发酵床对泌乳奶牛健康状况和生产性能的影响[J]. 饲料博览,2023(3):43-47.
[7] 郭胜. 奶牛常见病的防控措施[J]. 畜牧兽医科学(电子版),2022(6):53-54.
[8] 季凤娟. 奶牛常见疾病的防治措施[J]. 畜禽业,2022,33(1):111-112.
[9] 李胤知,赵贺,贺腾飞,等. 北方冬季肉牛舍环境控制技术的发展与应用[J]. 吉林农业大学学报,2023,45(4):497-504.
[10] 薛晶晶. 黑龙江省某规模化奶牛场犊牛腹泻发病规律调查及复合微生态制剂的预防效果[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2022.
[11] 王杰. 某规模化奶牛场犊牛断奶应激的影响因素调查及母牛安抚素对其缓解作用研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2023.
[1] 李发兰. 泌乳前期奶牛在不同采食水平下产奶性能的差异比较[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 24-28.
[2] 葛保华, 戴培强, 李铁新. 中药复方制剂治疗奶牛酮病的效果分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 41-45.
[3] 刘登堂. 17 味中药及其复方对奶牛乳房炎金黄色葡萄球菌的体外抑菌试验研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 46-50.
[4] 王惠霞, 崔平, 李本科. 山东滨州地区某规模奶牛养殖场奶牛蹄病流行病学及治疗情况调查[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 51-55.
[5] 于团, 刘刚, 孙强. 奶牛肢蹄病的发病原因与防控要点分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(2): 60-64.
[6] 马昕鑫, 叶璟. 奶牛养殖产业发展空间关联网络与影响因素研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 9-16.
[7] 李西康. 围产期补充过瘤胃蛋氨酸对奶牛生产性能和免疫能力影响的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 28-31.
[8] 曹守玉. 夏季高温条件下在饲粮中添加酵母培养物对奶牛生产性能和抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 32-36.
[9] 黄吉峰. 高产奶牛饲养管理技术措施探讨[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 37-40.
[10] 王少利. 口蹄疫疫苗诱发奶牛瘫痪的诊疗分析案例[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 51-55.
[11] 曹芳, 魏勇, 吴忧, 王晨豫, 赵鹏飞, 李智星, 任静静, 齐亚银. 一例混合感染奶牛乳房炎病例病原菌分离鉴定及药敏试验[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(1): 56-60.
[12] 胡智辉, 谷栗琨, 魏玉东, 韩燕, 王欢, 朱妮, 郝海生, 赵善江, 朱化彬. 常见传染性疾病对奶牛繁殖性能的影响及其研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(9): 3-11.
[13] 王欢, 赵慧秋, 谷栗琨, 赵善江, 胡智辉, 朱妮, 郝海生, 朱化彬. 乳房炎对奶牛繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(9): 12-17.
[14] 王建中, 张恒, 李晓光, 王刚, 张廷青. 奶牛犬新孢子虫流产诊疗防[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(9): 18-27.
[15] 陈勇, 杨青通, 曹高寨, 李强, 姚珍珍, 邵亚群. 两种孕酮缓释栓对比研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(9): 34-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!