首页 /
期刊介绍 / 道德声明
-
《中国乳业》出版伦理指导原则
1 作者的出版伦理
1.1 署名作者应均是论文的实质性贡献者，不可随意增减作者。所有作者同意同意署名顺序并认可稿件终版的情况下，方可投稿给本刊。
1.2 作者应确保论文的内容是原创的，全部数据真实可靠，无篡改或伪造数据和图片情形，拥有自主知识产权，未在国内外公开发表过，无抄袭、伪造和一稿多投问题，不涉及保密及其他与著作权有关的侵权问题。文中使用了他人的作品和/或文字，应当以参考文献的形式引用。编辑部对所有投稿使用CNKI学术不端文献检测系统或万方检测-学术预审版进行筛选，文字复制比不超过10%。
1.3 作者在向期刊投稿时，应公开所有可能使其研究结果和论文撰写产生偏倚的经济或非经济的利益冲突。
1.4 作者有义务配合编辑部对稿件的审查，例如：提供原始数据、知情同意书或原始文献等。
1.5 以活脊椎动物和/或高等无脊椎动物为研究对象时，作者需确认动物实验需严格遵守国家实验动物相关法律、法规和标准，包括但不局限于《实验动物管理条例》（2017年3月1日修订版）和《实验动物福利伦理审查指南》（GB/T 35892—2018）等，同时我们建议实验遵循国际生物医学期刊关于动物实验研究报告的相关指南共识（如ARRIVE 2.0、IGP 2012、IAVE Guidelines 2010等）。对于人类受验者，作者还需提供声明，说明研究样本是通过人类受验者的知情同意获得的（或解释未获得同意的原因，例如数据是匿名分析的等）。
1.6 尊重审稿专家和编辑的修改意见，如有异议，可提出申述。当发现自己发表的论文有重大错误或不准确时，作者有义务及时通知编辑部，并配合编辑部撤回论文或发表适当的“更正”声明。
1.7 同意将论文的著作权及相关财产权授予《中国乳业》编辑部。
2 审稿专家的出版伦理
2.1 在收到审稿邀请时，应首先了解期刊的定位及审稿要求，审视自己的专业知识和研究方向与所评审的稿件是否匹配，如不匹配，应及时、明确告知编辑/编委。
2.2 应以维护学术诚信，尊重学术自由为原则，对稿件进行公正、客观、科学、准确的评价，及时给出合理、有建设性的评审意见。不因为包括宗教、种族、政治信仰、性别、地域、机构等因素而影响对学术水平的评价，避免受商业利益的驱动。
2.3 应在规定时间内评审稿件并给出具体的审稿意见，如果因故不能按时完成评审，应及时反馈。
2.4 尊重作者的研究成果，对审查的稿件内容严格保密。将论文转给其他人（同事、学生等）审理时，应取得期刊编辑部许可。
2.5 与作者存在利益冲突时，应与编辑部及时沟通，主动回避评审该稿件。
2.6 仅能建议增加与论文研究内容相关的重要参考文献，不应为了提高个人引用次数或曝光度而建议作者引用不相关文献。
2.7 在提交审稿意见后，审稿专家如果获得相关信息足以影响最初的反馈或建议，以及论文出版后，发现任何审稿过程中未发现的问题或潜在的利益冲突，应及时联系编辑部。
2.8 如发现审稿人利用审稿谋取私利乃至剽窃所审稿件内容时，期刊将根据情节轻重分别予以警告、终生禁止其审稿乃至公开披露等处分。
3 编辑与编辑部的出版伦理
3.1 严格遵守国家新闻出版署制定的各项出版法规，出版规范符合国内、国际惯例。
3.2 及时、公正地处理每一篇稿件。仅依据论文的科学性、创新性、可读性等论文本身内容及与期刊收稿范围匹配度对论文做出接受、修改或退稿的决定；不对作者的工作单位、性别、专业职称、学术荣誉等存在偏见。
3.3 尊重作者的研究成果和知识独立性。对稿件内容、作者及审稿专家保密。
3.4 选取审稿专家时，应回避选择与作者具有利益冲突（如项目组成员、同事关系、同学关系、亲属关系等）的专家审阅稿件。
3.5 编辑如与作者存在利益冲突时（参与论文撰写、项目研究，或与作者具有同门关系、亲属关系），需主动回避处理该稿件。
3.6 不得干预外审专家的同行评议过程，确保同行专家独立地给出评审建议。
3.7 对已录用稿件，若发现其存在学术不端，编辑部有权退稿，并告知作者单位。
3.8 通过在必要时发布“更正”信息和撤稿，以及追究涉嫌研究和出版中的不端或不当行为，来保护已发表记录的完整性。
4 广告政策
4.1 所有广告均需经出版商（中国农业科学院农业信息研究所《中国乳业》编辑部）批准，出版商保留随时拒绝或取消任何广告的权利。
4.2 广告必须遵守《中华人民共和国广告法》。《中国乳业）》仅考虑与乳业科研成果或学术活动相关的广告。广告将显示在期刊内页的固定位置。
4.3 广告与学术内容分开，且不应影响编辑决策。
4.4 广告必须明确标识为广告，并与学术内容清晰区分。期刊不会以学术内容的形式发布广告。
详情请联系：zhgry@caas.cn。
5 宣传与征稿
期刊的宣传和征稿应适当、清晰、目标明确且不引人反感。
Ethical Guidelines to Publication in China Dairy
1 Author's Publishing Ethics
1.1 All named authors must be substantive contributors to the paper, and no arbitrary additions or deletions of authors are permitted. Submissions to this journal are only accepted when all authors agree to the order of names and acknowledge the final version of the manuscript.
1.2 Authors must ensure the following: the content is original, all data and images are authentic and reliable with no tampering or falsification, the work possesses independent intellectual property rights, has not been publicly published worldwide, and is free from plagiarism, fabrication, or multiple submissions. The work must not involve confidentiality breaches or copyright infringement. Any use of others' works or texts must be cited as references. The editorial office will screen all submissions using the CNKI Academic Integrity Detection System or Wanfang Detection-Academic Pre-review Version, with a text duplication ratio not exceeding 10%.
1.3 When submitting manuscripts to journals, authors should disclose all potential economic or non-economic conflicts of interest that may influence their research outcomes and paper writing.
1.4 The author is obligated to cooperate with the editorial department in the review of the manuscript, such as providing original data, informed consent forms, or original literature.
1.5 When studying living vertebrates and/or higher invertebrates, authors must ensure that animal experiments strictly comply with national laws, regulations, and standards related to laboratory animals, including but not limited to the "Regulations on Laboratory Animals" (revised version of March 1, 2017) and the "Laboratory animal-Guideline for ethical review of animal welfare" (GB/T 35892—2018). Additionally, we recommend that experiments adhere to the guidelines and consensus of international biomedical journals regarding the reporting of animal experiment studies (e.g., ARIVE 2.0, IGP 2012, IAVE Guidelines 2010, etc.). For human subjects, authors must provide a statement indicating that the study samples were obtained through informed consent from human subjects (or explain the reasons for not obtaining consent, such as data being analyzed anonymously).
1.6 Respect the revision suggestions of peer reviewers and editors. If there are any objections, a statement may be submitted. When the author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the published paper, it is obligated to promptly notify the editorial office and cooperate with the editorial office to retract the paper or issue an appropriate "correction" statement.
1.7 The author agrees to grant the copyright and related property rights of the paper to the Editorial Department of China Dairy.
2 Publication Ethics of Reviewers
2.1 Upon receiving an invitation to review a manuscript, one should first understand the journal's positioning and review requirements, and assess whether one's professional expertise and research focus align with the manuscript under review. If not, the editor should be promptly and clearly informed.
2.2 Manuscripts shall be evaluated impartially, objectively, scientifically, and accurately based on the principles of upholding academic integrity and respecting academic freedom, with timely and constructive review comments provided. Evaluations of academic merit shall not be influenced by factors such as religion, ethnicity, political beliefs, gender, region, or institutional affiliation, and shall avoid being driven by commercial interests.
2.3 Manuscripts shall be reviewed within the stipulated timeframe with specific feedback provided. Should the review process be delayed due to unforeseen circumstances, prompt communication is required.
2.4 Respect the research achievements of the authors and strictly maintain confidentiality regarding the content of the reviewed manuscripts. When transferring the paper to others (colleagues, students, etc.) for review, permission must be obtained from the journal editorial board.
2.5 When there is a conflict of interest with the author, the editor should be informed promptly and the manuscript should be voluntarily declined for review.
2.6 The system should only recommend adding relevant references to the research content, and must not suggest authors cite unrelated references to boost citation counts or visibility.
2.7 After submitting review comments, if the reviewers obtain information that could affect the initial feedback or suggestions, or if any issues not identified during the review process or potential conflicts of interest are discovered after publication, they should promptly contact the editorial office.
2.8 If a reviewer is found to exploit the peer-review process for personal gain or even plagiarize the content of the manuscript under review, the journal may impose disciplinary actions ranging from warnings to lifetime disqualification from peer-review, or even public disclosure, depending on the severity of the case.
3 Editing and Publishing Ethics of Editorial Staff
3.1 Strictly comply with all publishing regulations issued by the National Press and Publication Administration, ensuring that publishing standards conform to domestic and international practices.
3.2 Timely and impartial processing of each manuscript. Decisions regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection shall be based solely on the scientific validity, originality, readability, and other intrinsic content of the paper, as well as its alignment with the journal's acceptance criteria; no bias shall be introduced regarding the author's affiliation, gender, professional title, or academic honors.
3.3 Respect the research achievements and intellectual independence of the authors. Maintain confidentiality regarding the manuscript content, authors, and peer reviewers.
3.4 When selecting peer reviewers, conflicts of interest (e.g., project team members, colleagues, classmates, or relatives) should be avoided.
3.5 Editors who have conflicts of interest with authors (e.g., involvement in manuscript writing, research projects, or familial/academic relationships) must recuse themselves from handling the manuscript.
3.6 Do not interfere with the peer review process of external reviewers to ensure independent evaluation recommendations.
3.7 For accepted manuscripts, the editorial board reserves the right to reject submissions if academic misconduct is identified, and will notify the author's institution accordingly.
3.8 Protect the integrity of published records by issuing "corrections" and retraction when necessary, and by investigating suspected misconduct or improper conduct in research and publication.
4 Advertising Policy
4.1 All advertisements must be approved by the publisher (Editorial Office of China Dairy at the Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China), which reserves the right to reject or cancel any advertisement at any time.
4.2 Advertisements must comply with the Advertising Law of the People's Republic of China. Only dairy research achievements or academic activities related advertisements will be considered. Advertisements will be displayed in a fixed position on the inside page of the journal.
4.3 Advertisements are kept separate from the published content and should not influence editorial decisions.
4.4 Advertisements must be clearly labeled as advertisements and distinctly separated from academic content. The journal will not publish advertisements in the form of academic content.
For details, please contact: zhgry@caas.cn.
5 Publicity and Solicitation
The publicity of the journal and solicitation of manuscripts should be appropriate, clear, well targeted, and unobtrusive.
