中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 40-44.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.11.06

• 智慧养殖专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

爱尔兰奶牛场产奶量记录方法的挑战与机遇:测定日产奶和奶罐样品比较

李胜楠, 郭凯军*   

  1. 北京农学院,北京 100096
  • 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-12-10
  • 通讯作者: *郭凯军(1973-),男,河南西平人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 作者简介:李胜楠(2002-),女,天津人,在读硕士,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 基金资助:
    北京市家畜创新团队项目(BAIC05-2024)

Challenges and Opportunities of Milk Recording Methods in Irish Dairy Farms

LI Shengnan, GUO Kaijun*   

  1. Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100096
  • Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-12-10

摘要: [目的] 探索和量化在爱尔兰商业奶牛场测定日、与奶罐样品的乳脂率和乳蛋白率的差异。[方法] 数据来自2021年2 841 个畜群的5 742 次产奶量记录,奶罐样品与测定日记录在同一天进行。检测日奶样乳脂率和乳蛋白率使用ICAR批准的上午或下午交替采集奶样的预测方程来评估。[结果] 测定日与奶罐样品的乳脂率和乳蛋白率之间的Pearson相关系数分别为0.82和0.96。这些相关性对应于乳脂率和乳蛋白率的平均差异为0.1%和0.01%,测定日产奶量记录显示两种测量值均较低。使用EDIY(自动采集测试样本的电子自制仪表)和Non-EDIY(由牛奶记录员手动采集测试样品)两种设备测定的牛群乳脂率相关性分别为0.87和0.72。测定日产奶量较高的畜群表现出较低的乳脂率相关性。同样,在产奶高峰季节采集的奶样与非高峰季节采集的奶样相比,乳脂率差异更大。[结论] 与奶罐奶样相比,在测定日产奶量记录报告中,乳脂率变化较大。这种变化的程度受产奶量、季节、记录设备或者这3 个因素的综合影响。

关键词: 产奶量记录, 爱尔兰, 奶牛场, 奶牛

Abstract: [Objective] This study was to explore and quantify the differences in fat and protein percentages between milk samples collected on test day milk recordings and those obtained from daily bulk collections in commercial dairy herds in Ireland. [Method] The dataset comprised 5 742 milk recordings from 2 841 herds in 2021,where daily bulk collections were taken on the same day as the milk recording. The predicted fat and protein percentages for test day milk were estimated using either the AM or PM milk samples and were incorporated into prediction equations approved by ICAR. [Result] The Pearson correlation between fat and protein percentages from test day milk recording and daily bulk samples was 0.82 and 0.96,respectively. These correlations correspond to mean differences of 0.1% and 0.01% for fat and protein percentages,with the average test day milk recording showing lower values for both measurements. Fat percentage correlations for herds using EDIY (electronic do it yourself meters which take a test sample automatically) and Non-EDIY (manual recordings where a milk recorder visits and takes a test sample) recording devices were 0.87 and 0.72, respectively. Herds with a higher average test day cow yield demonstrated a lower fat percentage correlation. Similarly,samples taken during peak milk production season exhibited larger differences in fat percentages compared to those taken during the off-peak milk production season. [Conclusion] The findings of this study clearly indicate that the largest variation is observed in the fat percentage reported in test day milk recordings when compared to the corresponding daily bulk samples. The extent of this variation is affected by yield,season,recording type,or a combination of all three factors.

Key words: milk recording, Irish, dairy farm, daily cow

[1] Irish Cattle Breeding Federation. Number of herds Milk Recording increases 11.7%[EB/OL].https://www.icbf.com/number-of-herds-milk-recording-increases-11-7/,2022-06-22.
[2] Irish Cattle Breeding Federation. Milk recording service options[EB/OL]. https://www.icbf.com/wp/?page_id=291,2023-05-10.
[3] Balaine L,Dillon E J,Läpple D,et al.Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms[J].Land Use Policy,2020,92:104437.
[4] Berry D P,Olori V E,Cromie A R,et al.Accuracy of predicting milk yield from alternative milk recording schemes[J].Animal Science,2005,80(1):53-60.
[5] Irish Cattle Breeding Federation.2021 ICBF Annual Report[EB/OL]. https://www.icbf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ICBF-Annual-Report-2021.pdf,2023-05-15.
[1] 邵亚群, 李强. 生殖激素调控卵泡发育影响母牛繁殖性能的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 30-33.
[2] 黄萌萌, 刘婷婷, 何珊珊, 白文娟, 李竞前, 闫奎友. 奶牛生产性能测定实验室现场评审中发现的薄弱环节及改进措施[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 34-39.
[3] 陈星星, 聂新华, 韩鹏, 田雨佳, 姚琨, 汪湛, 曹梦哲. 有机微量元素对奶牛的应用研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 40-45.
[4] 孙秀雯. 不同粗饲料配比对泌乳牛生产性能和瘤胃消化功能影响的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 46-50.
[5] 贾春旺, 蒋向君, 张严伟, 张琦, 汪营, 张健, 杨菲菲. 植物提取物对泌乳中后期奶牛采食量和产奶性能以及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 51-55.
[6] 孙艳, 谢凯, 秦娜. 烟台市奶农种养加一体化发展情况分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 74-77.
[7] 赵成莹, 袁静, 王宝菊, 刘恒煜, 刘承军, 周广驰, 李志强, 刘晓. 泌乳早期日粮中添加甘草多糖对奶牛生产性能及血清指标的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 93-97.
[8] 白学兵. 热应激对奶牛泌乳性能影响的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 98-102.
[9] 王凯. 奶牛蹄病病因分析与综合防控策略探讨[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 103-108.
[10] 郭海娥, 韩红亮. 奶牛常见蹄病的发病原因[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 114-118.
[11] 韩萌, 王礞礞, 张超. 新质生产力重塑奶牛养殖业关键环节要素[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 28-33.
[12] 白学兵. 奶牛瘤胃微生物对围产期能量负平衡调控的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 45-48.
[13] 韦玉庆, 韦玉姣, 邓少立. 规模奶牛场主要疫病净化技术路线及示范推广效益分析——以广西鹿寨县为例[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 54-58.
[14] 宋富华. 噬菌体在奶牛生产中的应用研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 59-63.
[15] 毕金凤. 微生态制剂治疗奶牛瘤胃酸中毒的效果分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 69-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!