中国乳业 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 53-57.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.22.11.09

• 饲草饲料 • 上一篇    下一篇

昆明市奶牛部分饲料霉菌毒素污染状况调查

杜江1, 冯俊2, 周亚平3, 刘琴3,*, 张任华3, 和潇3, 谢丽韫3, 张泉鹏3, 彭洪新3   

  1. 1 嵩明县畜牧渔业发展中心,云南嵩明 651700
    2 昆明市官渡区小板桥街道城市管理综合服务中心,云南昆明 650299
    3 昆明市动物卫生监督所,云南昆明 650041
  • 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-14
  • 通讯作者: *刘琴(1971-),女,云南昭通人,硕士,畜牧师,研究方向为反刍动物营养。
  • 作者简介:杜江(1969-),男,云南昆明人,本科,高级畜牧师,研究方向为动物疫病防控和畜牧技术推广;冯俊(1979-),男,云南昆明人,本科,兽医师,研究方向为动物疫病防控;周亚平(1966-),男,云南曲靖人,本科,高级畜牧师,研究方向为动物疫病防控和畜牧技术推广;张任华(1981-),女,湖南郴州人,硕士,研究方向畜产品质量安全监测和奶牛生产技术推广;和潇(1987-),男,云南怒江人,本科,研究方向为畜产品质量安全监测和奶牛生产技术推广;谢丽韫(1978-),女,云南昆明人,硕士,研究方向为畜产品质量安全监测和奶牛生产技术推广;张泉鹏(1981-),男,山东济南人,硕士,研究方向为动物疫病防控和畜牧技术推广;彭洪新(1985-),男,云南曲靖人,本科,兽医师,研究方向为畜产品质量安全监测和奶牛生产技术推广。

Investigation on Mycotoxin Pollution in Dairy Cow Feed in Kunming

DU Jiang1, FENG Jun2, ZHOU Yaping3, LIU Qin3,*, ZHANG Renhua3, HE Xiao3, XIE Liyun3, ZHANG Quanpeng3, PENG Hongxin3   

  1. 1Songming County Animal Husbandry and Fishery Development Center,Songming Yunnan 651700;
    2Kunming Guandu District Xiaobanqiao Sub District Urban Management Comprehensive Service Center,Kunming Yunnan 650299;
    3Kunming Institute of Animal Health Supervision,Kunming Yunnan 650041
  • Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-14

摘要: [目的]为掌握昆明市部分奶牛饲料霉菌毒素污染状况,采集了昆明市部分奶牛场(养殖小区)的饲用玉米面、全株玉米青贮,全混合日粮(TMR)共80 批次进行分析。[方法]采用酶联免疫吸附试剂盒测定80 批饲料中黄曲霉毒素B1(AFB1)、赭曲霉毒素A(OTA),玉米赤霉烯酮(ZEN)、伏马毒素(FB1+FB2)、T-2毒素、呕吐毒素(DON)6 种霉菌毒素含量,超标情况按照《GB 13078—2017 饲料卫生标准》判定。[结果]玉米面中ZEN检出率88.2%,平均值为(1 047.2±935.5)μg/kg,超标率达到76.4%; DON检出率82.3%,平均值为(1 375.2±635.2)μg/kg,FB1+FB2+FB3检出率35.3%,平均值为(277.4±490.9)μg/kg,AFB1检出率为35.3%,平均值为(8.6±2.9)μg/kg;OTA、T-2毒素均未检出。TMR中DON检出率25%,平均值为(1 047.2±935.5)μg/kg,AFB1检出率为16.7%,平均值为(2.3±1.2)μg/kg,ZEN检出率16.7%,平均值(120.1±112.6)μg/kg,均未超标;OTA、T-2毒素、FB1+FB2+FB3均未检出。全株玉米青贮饲料中DON检出率47.1%,平均值为(1 375.2±635.2)μg/kg,ZEN检出率为29.4%,平均值为(142.5±191.1)μg/kg,均未超标;AFB1、OTA、T-2毒素、FB1+FB2+FB3均未检出。[结论]霉菌毒素检出率:DON>ZEN>AFB1>FB1+FB2+FB3 >T-2毒素和OTA;污染程度:玉米面>全株玉米青贮>TMR。三类饲料中霉菌毒素都有不同程度的污染,其中玉米面霉菌毒素污染风险最大,在运输、存储、使用时要予以高度关注,避免造成经济损失。

关键词: 奶牛, 部分饲料, 霉菌污染状况, 调查

Abstract: [Objective]In order to understand the mycotoxin contamination of feed for some dairy cows in Kunming,80 batches of feed corn flour,whole corn silage and total mixed ration (TMR) were collected from some dairy farms(breeding areas)in Kunming for analysis. [Methods]Six mycotoxins,including aflatoxin B1(AFB1),ochratoxin A (OTA),zearalenone (ZEN),fumotoxin (FB1+FB2),T-2 toxin and vomiting toxin (DON),were determined in 80 batches of feed with ELISA kit. The excessive level was determined according to the Hygienical standard for feeds(GB 13078-2017). [Result]The detection rate of ZEN in corn flour was 88.2%,with an average of (1047.2 ± 935.5)μg/kg,the exceeding standard rate reached 76.4%.The detection rate of DON was 82.3%,the average value was (1375.2±635.2)μg/kg,the detection rate of FB1+FB2+FB3 was 35.3%,and the average value was (277.4±490.9)μg/kg,the detection rate of AFB1 was 35.3%,and the average value was (8.6±2.9) μg/kg,OTA and T-2 toxin were not detected. The detection rate of DON in TMR was 25%,and the average value was (1047.2±935.5) μg/kg,the detection rate of AFB1 was 16.7%,the average value was (2.3±1.2) μg /kg,ZEN detection rate 16.7%,mean value (120.1±112.6)μg/kg,not exceeding the standard,OTA,T-2 toxin,FB1+FB2+FB3 were not detected. The detection rate of DON in whole feed corn silage was 47.1%,and the average value was(1375.2±635.2)μg/kg,the detection rate of ZEN was 29.4%,and the average value was (142.5±191.1)μg/kg,not exceeding the standard.AFB1,OTA,T-2 toxin,FB1+FB2+FB3 were not detected.[Conclusion]Mycotoxin detection rate: DON>ZEN>AFB1>FB1+FB2+FB3>T-2 toxin and OTA. Pollution degree: corn flour>whole corn silage>TMR. Mycotoxins in the three types of feed are polluted,among which the risk of mycotoxin pollution in corn flour is the largest. Great attention should be paid to its transportation,storage and use to avoid economic losses.

Key words: dairy cows, partial feed, mycotoxins pollution, investigation

[1] 吴开开,张康,张景艳,等.甘肃部分地区规模化奶牛场饲料霉菌毒素污染状况调查[J]. 动物医学进展,2019,40(9):137-140.
[2] 周健庭,郑和.2021年饲料霉菌毒素污染情况调查报告[J].养猪,2022(12):12-16.
[3] 王娟,王改琴,李钒,等.2020年饲料原料霉菌毒素污染状况调查[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(15):6275-6282.
[4] 朱风华,朱连勤.2019年山东省饲料原料及配合饲料主要霉菌毒素污染状况调查[J].中国畜牧杂志,2020,56(11):189-194.
[5] 白萨茹拉,张恒涛,夏传齐,等,中国奶牛常规饲料霉菌毒素污染现状及脱霉剂应用[J].中国畜牧杂志,2021,57(12):279-281.
[6] 邢岗,袁耀武,邱小为.饲料霉变的原因、危害及预防措施[J].现代畜牧科技,2022(4):59-60.
[7] 张治成. 饲料中霉菌毒素的毒害机理、检测方法和控制措施[J].现代畜牧科技,2019(6):58-59.
[8] 付春丽,刘文静,高腾云.霉菌毒素对奶牛的影响及其控制措施[J].草业科学,2015(9):1500-1507.
[9] 赵巍,王兰惠,甄玉国,等.2020年国内玉米青贮霉菌毒素普查报告[J].中国乳业,2021(8):56-59.
[1] 袁芳, 邓好好, 王建平. 有机酸肠道调节剂对奶牛产奶量、采食量和主要DHI指标的作用效果研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 20-25.
[2] 丁志君. 同期发情技术在规模化奶牛场中的应用[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 25-28.
[3] 孙向飞. 复方中草药灌注液治疗奶牛子宫内膜炎临床效果观察[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 34-37.
[4] 孔兴旺, 霍夏辉. 规模化奶牛场奶牛亚临床型乳房炎流行规律调查[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 37-40.
[5] 郭峰, 宗志权. 汝南县奶牛附红细胞体病的流行病学调查与综合防控[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 41-44.
[6] 何显杰. 中草药对奶牛乳房炎致病菌的体外抑菌效果试验[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 44-47.
[7] 王福刚, 张曦文, 刘召乾, 韩寒. 复方中草药添加剂对奶牛生产性能的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 48-51.
[8] 高雁, 曾军, 霍向东, 孙建, 李凤鸣, 刘建成, 陈开旭, 林青. 奶牛粪污资源化利用模式推广[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 57-61.
[9] 生霞霞. 日粮组成对牛奶中乳成分合成与调控机制影响的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 11-14.
[10] 杨露. 益生菌对奶牛产奶量、乳成分及瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 15-18.
[11] 张泰彪, 朱新荣, 张财祯, 陆长斌. 乳头封闭剂和不同干奶药品对预防奶牛产后乳房炎的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 24-28.
[12] 寨鸿瑞, 张懂理, 郭庆. 7 味中药对奶牛乳房炎病原菌的体外抑菌试验研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 34-37.
[13] 温岚. 奶牛育种技术的专利信息分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(7): 12-16.
[14] 李彦林. 热应激对奶牛生产性能的影响及缓解措施[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(7): 17-20.
[15] 李浩, 徐文波, 郭涛, 罗萍, 刘珍, 郑新宝, 冯东河. 玉米秸秆青贮饲料与全株玉米青贮饲料饲喂奶牛的差异研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(7): 21-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!