中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 80-84.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.06.15

• 质量安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

生乳中抗生素测定值的不确定度测定——基于SNAP双流向酶联免疫法

陈炜楠, 杨爱君*, 何瑛, 梁俊健, 曹学思   

  1. 广东燕塘乳业股份有限公司,广东广州 510000
  • 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-01
  • 通讯作者: *杨爱君(1970-),女,广东潮州人,硕士,高级工程师,研究方向为乳品质量检测和质量保证。
  • 作者简介:陈炜楠(1995-),男,广东潮州人,本科,助理工程师,研究方向为乳品质量安全检测;何 瑛(1987-),女,广东广州人,本科,工程师,研究方向为乳品质量检测和质量保证;梁俊健(1987-),男,广东广州人,本科,工程师,研究方向为乳制品生产过程的品质控制;曹学思(1997-),女,广东广州人,本科,助理工程师,研究方向为乳品质量安全检测。

Determination of Uncertainty in the Determination of Antibiotics in Raw Milk--Based on SNAP-Dual-Flow Enzyme Immunoassay

CHEN Weinan, YANG Aijun*, HE Ying, LIANG Junjian, CAO Xuesi   

  1. Guangdong Yantang Dairy Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou Guangdong 510000
  • Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-01

摘要: [目的]对SNAP双流向酶联免疫法测定生乳中抗生素含量的不确定度进行评定。[方法]运用三合一试纸,测定β-内酰胺类、四环素类、头孢氨苄等生乳中抗生素,分析不确定度来源,建立完整数学模型,分析和评定模型中各分量,合成相对标准不确定度并扩展,得出生乳样本中抗生素——β-内酰胺类、四环素类、头孢氨苄抗生素测定值的扩展不确定度。[结果]当置信度为95%时,得到生乳中抗生素测定值结果分别为:X(β-内酰胺类)=0.64±0.173 8,取k=2,扩展不确定度为U=0.173 8。X(四环素类)=0.62±0.168 4,取k=2,扩展不确定度为U=0.168 4。X(头孢氨苄)=0.37±0.100 4,取k=2,扩展不确定度为U=0.100 4 mg/kg。[结论]试验过程的不确定度主要来源于样品重复性、取样量、试纸读数仪、结果计算引入。该方法可为SNAP双流向酶联免疫法关于生乳中抗生素测定值的不确定度评定提供参考。

关键词: SNAP双流向酶联免疫法, 生乳, 抗生素, 测定值, 不确定度

Abstract: [Objective] To evaluate the uncertainty of the SNAP dual-flow enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for determining the antibiotic content in raw milk. [Methods] Using a three-in-one test strip, antibiotics such as β-lactam, tetracycline, and cephalexin in raw milk were measured. The sources of uncertainty were analyzed, and a complete mathematical model was established. Each component in the model was analyzed and evaluated. The relative standard uncertainty was synthesized and expanded to obtain the expanded uncertainty of the antibiotic measurements for β-lactam, tetracycline, and cephalexin in raw milk samples. [Results] When the confidence level was 95%, the results of the antibiotic measurements in raw milk were: X(β-lactam) = 0.64±0.173 8, with k=2, and the expanded uncertainty was U=0.173 8. X(tetracycline) = 0.62±0.168 4, with k=2, and the expanded uncertainty was U=0.168 4. X(cephalexin) = 0.37±0.100 4, with k=2, and the expanded uncertainty was U=0.100 4 mg/kg. [Conclusion] The uncertainty in the experimental process mainly originates from sample repeatability, sampling volume, test strip reader, and result calculation. This method can provide a reference for evaluating the uncertainty of the SNAP dual-flow ELISA for determining antibiotic levels in raw milk.

Key words: SNAP two-flow enzyme immunoassay, raw milk, antibiotics, determination, uncertainty

[1] 樊蕴秀. 生乳中β-内酰胺酶快速筛选方法的研究[J].食品工业,2014,35(7):74-75.
[2] Ortelli D,Cognard E,Jan P,et al.Comprehensive fast multiresidue screening of 150 veterinary drugs in milk by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry[J].Chromatography B,2009,877:2363-2374.
[3] Nebot C,Iglesias A,Regal P,et al.Development of a multi-class method for the identification and quantification of residues of antibiotics,coccidioststs and corticosteroids in milk by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J].International Dairy,2012,22:78-85.
[4] Kantiani L,Farre M,Barcelo D.Analytical methodologies for the detection of β-lactam antibiotics in milk and feed samples[J].Trends in Analytical Chemistry,2009,28(6):729-744.
[5] 刘雪杰,邱宏瑞,陈济琛,等.牛奶抗生素残留检测方法研究进展[J].食品科学,2013,5:300-302.
[6] 叶兴乾,刘东红,陈建初.牛奶抗生素残留快速检测技术进展及应用现状[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(4):181-185.
[7] 吴永宁,邵兵,沈建忠.兽药残留检测与监控技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007.
[8] 李丹妮,贡松松,顾欣,等.生鲜牛乳中抗生素残留检测技术研究进展[J].中国乳品工业,2017(45):38-58.
[9] Offical Journal of the European Union,L22418August 1990 Concil Regulation 2377/90/EC of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedur for the establishment of maximum residue limits veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal arigin,Brussels,Belgium,1990.
[10] 中华人民共和国农业部235号公告.关于发布《动物性食品中兽药最高残留限量的通知》[B].[2002-12-24].
[11] 杨爱君. 牛奶中抗生素残留的几种常用检测方法[J].食品安全与检测,2004(10):60-61.
[12] Janine F A.Residues of antibiotics in milk:Persistence and quality interference[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,2020,100:93-101.
[13] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局.JJF1059.1—2012.测量不确定度评定与表示[S].
[14] 中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS—GL0062019.化学分析中不确定度的评估指南[S].
[1] 吕曼, 万忠华, 张丹琴. 生乳体细胞数分析及季节对乳成分的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(6): 85-88.
[2] 蔡云阁. 益生菌治疗奶牛乳腺炎的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(4): 67-71.
[3] 董成虎, 夏忠悦, 谭莲英, 钱成林, 宋艳梅. 生乳蛋白质稳定性评价方案建立及其应用[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(3): 75-79.
[4] 李婕, 曹学思, 杨爱君, 何瑛, 纪坤发, 罗少杰. 生乳中黄曲霉毒素M1快速检测方法的比对[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(12): 74-78.
[5] 邢益俊, 刘传栩, 杨爱君, 何瑛, 纪坤发. 火焰原子吸收光谱法测定牛乳中钙含量的不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(12): 79-85.
[6] 李婕, 曹学思, 杨爱君, 陈欣, 陈蓓蕾. 酶联免疫法测定乳粉中黄曲霉毒素M1含量的不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(11): 75-80.
[7] 何瑛, 曹学思, 纪坤发, 杨爱君, 陈欣, 陈春裕. 高效液相色谱法测定巴氏杀菌乳中糠氨酸含量的不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(9): 71-80.
[8] 杨美丰, 纪坤发, 何瑛, 利志锋, 陈锦璇, 杨爱君. 温度对紫外分光光度法测定生乳中亚硝酸盐含量的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 47-50.
[9] 张奇, 肖会姣, 武丽辉, 贾薇. 驴乳发酵乳源的植物乳杆菌L28鉴定及其对小鼠肠道菌群的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(5): 64-68.
[10] 陈春裕, 纪坤发, 何瑛, 杨爱君*. 乳粉溶解度测定的不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(12): 110-114.
[11] 葛萃萃, 王文祥, 吴曙霞, 张惠君, 王潇, 秦芸桦, 王静. 婴儿配方奶粉中二十碳四烯酸的测量不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(12): 104-109.
[12] 顾晟琳, 夏亚文, 徐琼. 乳粉中金黄色葡萄球菌测定不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(12): 115-119.
[13] 杨美丰, 纪坤发, 何瑛, 杨爱君. 分光光度法测定牛乳中亚硝酸盐含量的不确定度评定[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(10): 82-89.
[14] 崔承远. 婴幼儿配方乳粉中1,3-二油酸-2-棕榈酸甘油三酯的测量不确定度评估[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(1): 63-68.
[15] 邓燕琴, 陈柏锡, 张红梅, 兰宁, 何娓娓, 陈茂姣, 周忠瑶. 生乳储运条件对品质影响的探究[J]. 中国乳业, 2021, 0(8): 113-116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!