中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 78-82.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.07.15

• 疾病防治 • 上一篇    下一篇

2021—2023年贵州省凯里市牛羊重要疫病免疫效果调查分析

李心琼, 袁晓娟   

  1. 贵州省凯里市农业农村局,贵州凯里 556000
  • 出版日期:2024-07-25 发布日期:2024-08-01
  • 作者简介:李心琼（1965-）,女,彝族,贵州凯里人,高级畜牧师,研究方向为畜牧兽医技术推广;袁晓娟（1989-）,女,贵州遵义人,硕士,兽医师,研究方向为动物疫病防控。

Investigation and Analysis of Immune Effect of Important Diseases in Cattle and Sheep in Kaili City, Guizhou Province from 2021 to 2023

LI Xinqiong, YUAN Xiaojuan   

  1. Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Kaili Guizhou 556000
  • Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-01

PDF (PC)

20

摘要： [目的] 为做好牛羊疫病防控专项工作,科学评估牛羊口蹄疫和小反刍兽疫疫苗免疫效果。[方法] 用ELISA方法对2021—2023年采集的凯里市牛羊血清进行免疫抗体检测。[结果] 2021—2023年,规模场牛群O型口蹄疫免疫平均抗体合格率87.69%~89.31%,散养户牛群平均合格率65.91%~67.20%。规模场牛群A型口蹄疫免疫平均抗体合格率71.15%~72.07%,散养户牛群平均合格率55.91%~57.60%。规模场羊群O型口蹄疫免疫平均抗体合格率82.94%~85.56%,散养户平均合格率70.53%~72.27%。羊A型口蹄疫免疫平均抗体合格率65.88%~67.22%,散养户平均合格率53.68%~55.91%。规模场羊群小反刍兽疫免疫抗体合格率80.00%~81.11%,散养羊群平均抗体合格率71.05%~73.18%。[结论] 贵州省凯里市牛羊O型口蹄疫免疫效果较好,牛羊A型口蹄疫免疫效果相对较差,羊小反刍兽疫免疫效果很好,但牛羊O/A型口蹄疫免疫效果散养户比规模场差,规模场羊群小反刍兽疫免疫抗体合格率比散养户高。需加强规模场、散养户牛羊A型口蹄疫免疫和检测,同时加强散养户羊群小反刍兽疫免疫与效果评估,确保不发生重大动物疫情。

关键词: 凯里市, 牛, 羊, 口蹄疫, 小反刍兽疫, 免疫

Abstract: [Objective] In order to do a good job in the prevention and control of cattle and sheep disease, the immune effect of Foot-and-Mouth Disease（FMD）and Peste des Petits Ruminants（PPR）vaccine was scientifically evaluated. [Method] ELISA method was used to detect the immune antibody in the serum of cattle and sheep collected from Kaili city from 2021 to 2023. [Result] From 2021 to 2023, the average pass rate of FMD O immune antibody of cattle in large-scale farms was 87.69%~89.31%, and the average pass rate of cattle in free-range farms was 65.91%~67.20%. The average pass rate of antibodies against FMD A in scale farm cattle was 71.15%~72.07%, and 55.91%~57.60% in free-range cattle. The average pass rate of FMD O immune antibody in scale farm sheep was 82.94%~85.56%, and the average pass rate in free-range farm households was 70.53%~72.27%. The average qualified rate of antibody against FMD A in sheep was 65.88%~67.22%, and the average qualified rate of free-range households was 53.68%~55.91%. The qualified rate of PPR vaccine antibody in large-scale sheep farms was 80.00%~81.11%, and the average qualified rate of antibody in free-range sheep was 71.05%~73.18%. [Conclusion] In Kaili City, Guizhou province,the immune effect of type O FMD of cattle and sheep was good, the immune effect of type A FMD of cattle and sheep was relatively poor, and the immune effect of type O/A FMD of sheep was good, but the immune effect of type O/A FMD of cattle and sheep was worse than that of large-scale farms, and the qualified rate of immune antibody of large-scale farms was higher than that of large-scale farms. It is necessary to strengthen the immunization and detection of FMD type A in cattle and sheep of large-scale farms and free-range households, and strengthen the immunization and effectiveness assessment of PPR in sheep of free-range households to ensure that no major animal outbreaks occur.

Key words: Kaili City, cattle, sheep, Foot and mouth Disease（FMD）, Peste des Petits Ruminants（PPR）, immunity

[1] 衡巧. 重庆市巫山县2018—2020年猪、羊重大动物疫病免疫抗体水平监测与分析[D].重庆:西南大学,2020.
[2] 谈龙根. 羊常见传染病预防及治疗方法[J].今日畜牧兽医,2022,38(6):102-103.
[3] 王正文,汪忠荣,吴通奎,等.黔东南州2021年重大动物疫病抗体监测情况及对策[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2023,53(1):53-57.
[4] 陆李枝. 屏南县小反刍兽疫和羊口蹄疫免疫效果评价[J].福建畜牧兽医,2023,45(2):32-35.
[5] 钟召兵. 泰安市岱岳区不同规模奶牛场口蹄疫抗体检测结果分析[J].山东畜牧兽医,2022,43(7):10-15.
[1] 韩萌, 王礞礞, 张超. 新质生产力重塑奶牛养殖业关键环节要素[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 28-33.
[2] 白学兵. 奶牛瘤胃微生物对围产期能量负平衡调控的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 45-48.
[3] 李云龙, 李召英. 牛病毒性腹泻病毒与冠状病毒混合感染的PCR诊断[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 49-53.
[4] 韦玉庆, 韦玉姣, 邓少立. 规模奶牛场主要疫病净化技术路线及示范推广效益分析——以广西鹿寨县为例[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 54-58.
[5] 宋富华. 噬菌体在奶牛生产中的应用研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 59-63.
[6] 毕金凤. 微生态制剂治疗奶牛瘤胃酸中毒的效果分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 69-72.
[7] 张建滨. 菌酶复合物对中毒奶牛免疫功能、血清生化指标及治疗效果的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 73-77.
[8] 周欢, 宋艳梅, 范光彩, 夏忠悦, 马静, 骆敏, 谭莲英, 钱成林. 福林酚法高通量测定牛奶中蛋白酶活力的优化[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 92-97.
[9] 曾云凤, 周振新, 刘昨, 陈芳, 李文静, 陈宝宇, 李伟胤, 卜泽明. 盖勃法测定牛奶中脂肪含量的优化[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 98-101.
[10] 李嘉岩. 挤奶机器人对奶牛福利改善的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 9-13.
[11] 宋先赟. 瘤胃保护蛋氨酸在泌乳牛营养调控中的作用及其影响因素[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 14-17.
[12] 靳安红. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌对奶牛泌乳性能、血清生化以及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 18-24.
[13] 王西耀, 韩增霞, 林清香. 不同剂量过瘤胃氯化胆碱对围产期奶牛生产性能及血液生化指标的影响研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 25-30.
[14] 韦丹妮, 郭勇庆. 智慧养殖技术在奶牛生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 31-39.
[15] 刘德鑫, 赵曼, 周磊, 韩晓雨, 崔久辉, 陈军, 程延彬, 柴河, 袁鹏, 马殿玉, 乌兰, 任少广, 王伟国. 高寒气候区冬春季犊牛岛使用效果的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 40-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
ISSN 1671-4393
CN 11-4768/S
主管：中华人民共和国农业农村部
主办：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所
地址：北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
邮编：100081
电话：010-82106772
E-mail：zhgry@caas.cn

版权所有 © 《中国乳业》编辑部