中国乳业 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 57-60.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.24.11.09

• 智慧养殖专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

奶牛酸中毒相关行为模式的智慧识别

张雯晶, 郭凯军*   

  1. 北京农学院,北京 100096
  • 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-12-10
  • 通讯作者: *郭凯军(1973-),男,河南西平人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 作者简介:张雯晶(2000-),女,河南洛阳人,在读硕士,研究方向为智慧牧业科学与工程。
  • 基金资助:
    北京市家畜创新团队项目(BAIC05-2024)

Smart Identification of Behavioural Patterns Associated with Acidosis in Dairy Cows

ZHANG Wenjing, GUO Kaijun*   

  1. Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100096
  • Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-12-10

摘要: [目的] 对于高产奶牛来说,酸中毒是关乎健康和福利的重要问题,在确诊酸中毒前几天,其反刍行为就会受到影响。因此,奶牛的行为模式有望成为发现其早期酸中毒的关键指标。然而,目前行为模式分析在 预测酸中毒方面的发展还有很大空间。健康奶牛在酸中毒发作前数周或数月的行为模式可作为该病的危险因素来考量。确定酸中毒奶牛相较于健康奶牛是否表现出与该病相关的特定早期行为模式。[方法] 研究在两个西班牙商业农场和两个意大利商业农场展开,通过使用加速度计项圈,对奶牛从产犊到酸中毒前15 天的每日站立、躺卧、行走、反刍、进食时间进行详细记录。酸中毒组(n=10)为泌乳期间经两国兽医的诊断发生酸中毒的奶牛,酸中毒是由两国兽医记录诊断的。在西班牙农场,酸中毒病例还通过瘤胃pH探测胶囊来进一步确认(当一头奶牛瘤胃pH值低于5.6且持续至少50 min/d时被确认患有酸中毒)。之后,建立对照组,选取胎次和泌乳期与酸中毒组奶牛相同的健康奶牛(n=10),两组奶牛在酸中毒诊断前的日产奶量相近。采用方差分析法,对每头奶牛的所有行为数据进行群体效应的评估,分析它们在酸中毒与健康状态下所有行为(站立、躺卧、行走、反刍、进食时间)的截距和回归曲线斜率差异。[结果] 两组奶牛在反刍、躺卧和进食持续时间的截距和回归曲线斜率有显著差异。酸中毒组奶牛相比对照组在发作前85 天躺卧时间(10.55 h/d vs 10.22 h/d)、进食时间(3.55 h/d vs 3.41 h/d)更长(P<0.001)。与对照组相比,酸中毒奶牛在发作前115 天的反刍时长较长(7.73 h/d vs 6.86 h/d),但在发作前35 天较短(7.33 h/d vs 7.81 h/d)。此外,酸中毒前反刍时长随时间变化的趋势也不同,酸中毒组奶牛的回归曲线斜率系数更低(P<0.001)。[结论] 患酸中毒的奶牛可能在发作前数月就表现出不同的行为模式(如反刍时间较长)。但还需更大样本量开展进一步研究,以此确认行为模式的差异是否可被视为诊断酸中毒的依据。

关键词: 奶牛, 酸中毒, 行为活动, 时间安排

Abstract: [Objective] Acidosis is a major health and welfare issue,especially in high-producing dairy cows. During acidosis,rumination is affected,as early as a few days before diagnosis. For this reason,behavioural patterns can be considered as promising indicators for the early detection of acidosis. However,the power of behaviour analysis to predict acidosis can go much further,and behavioural patterns of healthy dairy cows,weeks or months before the onset of acidosis,could be used as a risk factor for the disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether cows that will subsequently develop acidosis,show early distinctive behavioural patterns associated with the disease compared to healthy cows. [Method] Daily hours spent standing,lying down, walking,ruminating and eating were recorded from calving to 15 d prior acidosis using accelerometer collars on two commercial farms in Spain and two others in Italy. The acidosis group (n=10)included cows that suffered an episode of acidosis during lactation. Acidosis was diagnosed by veterinary records in both countries. In Spanish farms,acidosis cases were confirmed by rumen pH measured by boluses(smaXtec Animal Care GmBH,Graz, Austria;a cow was confirmed as suffering from acidosis when exhibiting a rumen pH below 5.6 for at least 50 min/ d). A control group of healthy cows(n=10)balanced for parity and lactation stage was constituted afterwards. The daily milk production before the diagnosis of acidosis was similar in both groups. The group effect(acidosis vs healthy)on the intercept and the slope of the regression curve of each individual cow for all behaviours was analyzed using ANOVA. [Result] The group significantly affected the intercept of the regression curve for the ruminating ,lying down and eating duration showing that cows in the acidosis group spent more time lying(10.55 h/d vs 10.22 h/d)and eating(3.55 h/d vs 3.41 h/d)85 days before the onset of acidosis(P<0.001),compared to control cows. In addition,the rumination duration of acidosis cows was higher(7.73 h/d vs 6.86 h/d)115 d before the onset of acidosis , but lower(7.33 h/d vs 7.81 h/d)35 d before the onset of acidosis ,compared to the control cows. The trend in rumination duration over time prior to acidosis was also different as shown by the lower slope coefficient for acidosis cows(P<0.001). [Conclusion] This study suggested that cows that will subsequently suffer from acidosis might expressed distinct behavioural patterns(e.g. rumination)already months prior to the onset of acidosis. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm whether differences in behavioural patterns can be considered as promoters of acidosis.

Key words: dairy cow, acidosis, behavioural activities, time-budget.

[1] Plaizier J C,Krause D O,GozhoG N,et al.Subacute ruminalacidosis in dairy cows:The physiological causes,incidence and consequences[J]. The Veterinary Journal,2009,176(1):21-31.
[2] Yun S K and Han J D.Effect of feeding frequence of concentrate to milking cow in early Lactation on pH and VFA concentration in rumen fluid and on milk composition and milk yield[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1989,2(3):418-420.
[3] Penner G B,Beauchemin K A,Mutsvangwa T.Severity of ruminal acidosis in primiparous Holstein cows during the periparturient period[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(1):365-375.
[4] Beauchemin K,Penner G, New developments in understanding ruminalacidosis in dairy cows[A]. 18th Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference[C].Columbus:Ohio State University,2009.
[5] Devries T J,Beauchemin K A,Dohme F,et al.Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis:Feeding, ruminating,and lying behaviour[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2009,92(10): 5067-5078.
[6] Coon R E,Duffield T F,DeVries T J.Short communication:Risk of subacute ruminalacidosis affects the feed sorting behavior and milk production of early lactation cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(1):652-659.
[1] 邵亚群, 李强. 生殖激素调控卵泡发育影响母牛繁殖性能的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 30-33.
[2] 黄萌萌, 刘婷婷, 何珊珊, 白文娟, 李竞前, 闫奎友. 奶牛生产性能测定实验室现场评审中发现的薄弱环节及改进措施[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 34-39.
[3] 陈星星, 聂新华, 韩鹏, 田雨佳, 姚琨, 汪湛, 曹梦哲. 有机微量元素对奶牛的应用研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 40-45.
[4] 孙秀雯. 不同粗饲料配比对泌乳牛生产性能和瘤胃消化功能影响的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 46-50.
[5] 贾春旺, 蒋向君, 张严伟, 张琦, 汪营, 张健, 杨菲菲. 植物提取物对泌乳中后期奶牛采食量和产奶性能以及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(9): 51-55.
[6] 孙艳, 谢凯, 秦娜. 烟台市奶农种养加一体化发展情况分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 74-77.
[7] 赵成莹, 袁静, 王宝菊, 刘恒煜, 刘承军, 周广驰, 李志强, 刘晓. 泌乳早期日粮中添加甘草多糖对奶牛生产性能及血清指标的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 93-97.
[8] 白学兵. 热应激对奶牛泌乳性能影响的研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 98-102.
[9] 王凯. 奶牛蹄病病因分析与综合防控策略探讨[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 103-108.
[10] 郭海娥, 韩红亮. 奶牛常见蹄病的发病原因[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(8): 114-118.
[11] 韩萌, 王礞礞, 张超. 新质生产力重塑奶牛养殖业关键环节要素[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 28-33.
[12] 白学兵. 奶牛瘤胃微生物对围产期能量负平衡调控的研究进展[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 45-48.
[13] 韦玉庆, 韦玉姣, 邓少立. 规模奶牛场主要疫病净化技术路线及示范推广效益分析——以广西鹿寨县为例[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 54-58.
[14] 宋富华. 噬菌体在奶牛生产中的应用研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 59-63.
[15] 毕金凤. 微生态制剂治疗奶牛瘤胃酸中毒的效果分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(7): 69-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!