中国乳业 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 31-39.doi: 10.12377/1671-4393.25.05.06

• 饲养管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

后备牛不同生产阶段生长发育与头胎泌乳性能的关联分析

徐伟1, 董飞1, 马志愤1,2, 吴洁3, 窦立静3, 赵慧秋4, 李志佳4, 马修国4, 陈龙5,*   

  1. 1 一牧科技(北京)有限公司,北京 100016;
    2 草地农业智库,北京 100016;
    3 新疆生产建设兵团第八师畜牧兽医工作站,新疆石河子 832000;
    4 河北省畜牧总站,河北石家庄 050000;
    5 北京东方联鸣科技发展有限公司,北京 100085
  • 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-06-09
  • 通讯作者: *陈 龙(1982-),男,甘肃兰州人,硕士,研究方向为奶牛饲养管理技术。
  • 作者简介:徐 伟(1991-),男,安徽太和人,硕士,研究方向为分子数量遗传学;董 飞(1989-),男,山西定襄人,硕士,研究方向为动物遗传育种与繁殖;马志愤(1981-),男,甘肃靖远人,博士,研究方向为草地农业、智慧牧场;吴 洁(1981-),女,江苏宜兴人,硕士,高级兽医师,研究方向为畜牧业技术推广与科普教育;窦立静(1975-),女,新疆昌吉人,本科,高级兽医师,研究方向为动物疾病控制;赵慧秋(1974-),女,河北武安人,硕士,研究方向为奶牛养殖与繁育;李志佳(1984-),男,河北石家庄人,硕士,研究方向为奶牛养殖;马修国(1972-),男,山东济南人,本科,研究方向为奶牛养殖。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省现代农业产业技术体系奶牛产业创新团队项目(HBCT2024230203)

Correlation Analysis of Heifer Growth at Different Production Stages and Primiparous Milking Performance

XU Wei1, DONG Fei1, MA Zhifen1,2, WU Jie3, DOU Lijing3, ZHAO Huiqiu4, LI Zhijia4, MA Xiuguo4, CHEN Long5,*   

  1. 1 EYIMU Science and Technology(Beijing) Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100016;
    2 Agro-grassland Think Tank,Beijing 100016;
    3 Shihezi Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Workstation,the Eighth Division of Xinjiang Production andConstruction Corps,Shihezi Xinjiang 832000;
    4 Hebei Provincial Animal Husbandry Station,Shijiazhuang Hebei 050000;
    5 Beijing Eastern Bell Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100085
  • Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-06-09

摘要: [目的]统计2014—2024年出生后备牛4 个生产阶段称重数据和产奶数据,第一,分析近10年各阶段体重(kg)、平均日增重(kg/d)变化情况;第二,分析体重与平均日增重关系、两者与头胎产奶量的关系。[方法]平均日增重计算方法一:(某阶段体重-出生重)÷日龄;平均日增重计算方法二:(指定阶段体重-前一阶段体重)÷(指定阶段称重日期-前一阶段称重日期),分析后备牛生长发育情况和初产生产性能。[结果](1)后备牛断奶平均日增重由2015年0.80 kg/d增长至2023年0.88 kg/d;初产体重上升,初产日龄下降。(2)各阶段平均日增重存在较大差异,断奶平均日增重0.85~1.00 kg/d,转育成平均日增重最大0.95~1.10 kg/d,转参配平均日增重0.86~0.96 kg/d,初产平均日增重最低0.75~0.83 kg/d。(3)初产体重越大的牛只,头胎305 天产奶量和高峰产奶量越高,但牛只多数集中在(550,600]kg(A组),(600,650]kg(B组)体重范围内(占比70.5%,其中48.6%牛只在660~690 日龄内)。(4)A、B两组断奶体重、平均日增重差异不大,但转育成、转参配阶段,两组牛只体重差异逐渐拉大,B组初产体重高出A组45 kg左右;随日龄增加,A、B两组平均日增重差异逐渐明显,B组初产平均日增重较A组高60 g/天。(5)660~690 日龄分组(22~23 月龄),B组305 天产奶量较A组高约360 kg,高峰产奶量高约1.3 kg;B组305 天产奶量较C组(500,550]kg,高出约848 kg,高峰产奶量高出约3.3 kg。[结论]为实现后备牛在22~24 月龄达到初产体重600~650 kg(产前体重640~690 kg),牧场管理者需定期监测后备牛体重和评估日粮,监控生长发育状态,平衡日龄与体重关系,为后备牛提供充足但不过量营养摄入量,确保最佳发育状态,发挥生产潜力。

关键词: 后备牛, 体重, 平均日增重, 产奶量

Abstract: [Objective] By analyzing four body weights(BW,kg)in four phases of heifers'; life and milk production data from 2014 to 2024.The first objective was to analyze the changes of BW and average daily gain(ADG,kg/d) over the past decade,while the second was to examine the relationship between BW and ADG,as well as their correlation with primiparous milk yield. [Method] ADG calculation method 1:(weight at a designated phase-birth weight)÷age of days;ADG calculation method 2:(weight at designated phase-weight at previous phase)÷(weighing date at designated phase-weighing date at previous phase),analyzed heifers'; growth and development status and their primiparous milking performance. [Result](1)Weaning ADG increased from 0.80 kg/d in 2015 to 0.88 kg/d in 2023,first calving BW had increased,while the age at first calving had decreased.(2)There were significant differences in ADG at each phase.Weaning ADG ranged from 0.85 to 1.00 kg/d,maximum ADG was 0.95~1.10 kg/d which during transfer phase,first breeding ADG was 0.86~0.96 kg/d,and minimum ADG was 0.75~0.83 kg/d during first calving.(3)The larger first calving BW,the higher 305-d milk yield and peak milk yield.However,most cows'; first calving BW was concentrated in (550,600]kg(Group A) and (600,650]kg(Group B)(accounted for 70.5%,48.6% of them at the age of 660 d to 690 d).(4)There was no significant difference in BW and ADG between Group A and Group B at weaning phase,but during the transfer and first breeding phase,the differences in BW gradually widened.First calving BW of Group B was about 45 kg higher than Group A';s.With the age increases,the difference in ADG between Group A and Group B became increasingly evident.First calving ADG of Group B was 0.06 kg/d higher than Group A's.(5)At the age of 660~690 d(22~23 m),305-d milk yield of Group B was approximately 360 kg higher than Group A's,peak milk yield of Group B was approximately 1.3 kg higher;305-d milk yield of Group B was approximately 848 kg higher than Group C(500,550]kg,peak milk yield of Group B was approximately 3.3 kg higher. [Conclusion] To achieve first calving BW 600~650 kg(pre-calving BW 640~690 kg) for heifer at the age of 22~24 m,farm managers need to regularly monitor heifers'; BW and evaluate the diet to monitor their growth status and balance the relationships between age and BW.This will provide sufficient nutrient intake for heifer,to ensure maximizing their production potential under optimal developmental conditions.

Key words: heifer, body weight(BW), average daily gain(ADG), milk yield

[1] GB/T 37116—2018后备奶牛饲养技术规范.
[2] Zanton G I,Heinrichs A J.Meta-analysis to assess effect of prepubertal average daily gain of Holstein heifers on first-lactation production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(11):3860-3867.
[3] Little W,Kay R M.The effects of rapid rearing and early calving on the subsequent performance of dairy heifers[J].Animal Science,1979,29(1):131-142.
[4] Sejrsen K.Mammary development and milk yield in relation to growth rate in dairy and dual-purpose heifers[J].Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,1978,28(1):41-46.
[5] Erb H N,Smith R D,Oltenacu P A,et al.Path model of reproductive disorders and performance,milk fever,mastitis,milk yield,and culling in Holstein cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1985,68(12):3337-3349.
[6] Keown J F,Everett R W.Effect of days carried calf,days dry,and weight of first calf heifers on yield[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(7):1891-1896.
[7] Patterson D J,PerryR C,Kiracofe G,et al.Management considerations in heifer development and puberty[J].Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(12):4018-4035.
[8] Han L, Heinrichs A J, Vries A D,et al.Relationship of body weight at first calving with milk yield and herd life[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 104(1): 397-404.
[9] Handcock R C, Lopez-Villalobos L R,McNaughton P J,et al.Positive relationships between body weight of dairy heifers and their first-lactation and accumulated three-parity lactation production.[J].Journal of dairy science, 2019,102,4577-4589
[10] 金迪,彭华.我国规模奶牛场奶牛营养与饲喂管理现状分析[J].中国乳业,2023(12):16-21.
[1] 靳安红. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌对奶牛泌乳性能、血清生化以及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 18-24.
[2] 王西耀, 韩增霞, 林清香. 不同剂量过瘤胃氯化胆碱对围产期奶牛生产性能及血液生化指标的影响研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(6): 25-30.
[3] 刘凤泉. 不同水平蔗糖对泌乳奶牛体外产气及泌乳的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(5): 57-61.
[4] 李富, 侯金星, 张磊, 袁昊, 曹斌云, 宋宇轩, 安小鹏. 世界奶羊产业概况[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(12): 8-14.
[5] 管文波. 复合酶制剂对泌乳期奶牛乳成分、产奶量的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(12): 51-54.
[6] 杜宇, 魏勇, 李智星, 杨红卫, 李宏健, 刘友, 刘让. 新疆冬季规模化奶牛场氨气防控和产奶量相关性分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(12): 55-61.
[7] 李胜楠, 郭凯军. 爱尔兰奶牛场产奶量记录方法的挑战与机遇:测定日产奶和奶罐样品比较[J]. 中国乳业, 2024, 0(11): 40-44.
[8] 毛文斌, 余波, 李智星, 魏勇. 不同挤奶次数对奶牛产奶量的影响分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(3): 45-48.
[9] 刘玉静, 申茂欣, 赵同渊, 夏娜, 康一岚, 徐慧琳, 杨代蓉, 魏嘉. 乳酸菌发酵青贮玉米饲料对奶牛机体健康和生产性能的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(2): 58-62.
[10] 朱凯, 吕昕哲, 齐格, 张英虎, 赵和平, 刘光磊. 高产奶牛可持续发展略论[J]. 中国乳业, 2023, 0(12): 27-31.
[11] 杨露. 益生菌对奶牛产奶量、乳成分及瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(8): 15-18.
[12] 李浩, 徐文波, 郭涛, 罗萍, 刘珍, 郑新宝, 冯东河. 玉米秸秆青贮饲料与全株玉米青贮饲料饲喂奶牛的差异研究[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(7): 21-24.
[13] 买买提·克玉木, 袁理星, 崔繁荣, 闫向民, 马桢. 中草药添加剂对西门塔尔牛生产性能和隐性乳房炎的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(4): 28-33.
[14] 李国鹏. 青海省西宁市奶牛散养户基本情况调查分析[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(3): 2-5.
[15] 买买提·克玉木, 马桢, 樊振声, 杨振, 闫向民. 不同饲养方式对西门塔尔牛泌乳性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国乳业, 2022, 0(3): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!